As valedictorian of my high school class (Albion, Mich., 1976), I am probably as qualified as anyone to respond to V. Dion Haynes’ piece on the fate of high school valedictorians (Main news, June 11). To address a few of the points:
1. It is suggested that success comes easily for those at the top of their classes. Although I cannot speak for my peers, I can say without hesitation that it took a great deal of hard work for me to achieve that status. I certainly was not the smartest person in my class, but I would say that I was definitely one of the hardest-working. (Sorry, Ross Perot, but some of us did have to sweat to be No. 1.)
2. It is stated that the valedictorians in Professor Karen Arnold’s study favored financial security over creative fulfillment and social activism. Surprise! As long as minor conveniences like food and shelter are paid for with dollars and not good intentions, I expect many valedictorians will react to the pressures of daily living like a good percentage of the general population does–by pursuing decent-paying, secure careers.
3. Professor Arnold boldly concludes that only 5 of the 82 persons she studied have the potential for greatness. After having such judgment passed on them so early in life, I guess the other 77 may as well throw in the towel now, rather than wasting the rest of their time wallowing in mediocrity.
I apologize that not all of us are Einsteins, and that we have not achieved the “success” that was expected of us. I’ve not given up on the idea of accomplishing something great for which I’ll be remembered. For now, however, I find that “settling into the system” has been a great way to realistically meet the demands of everyday life (why do so many of the rest of you hold 9-to-5 jobs?). Please give us a break!
