Skip to content
Author
PUBLISHED: | UPDATED:
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

It’s a decision that’s made every day, sometimes subconsciously: whether to
grocery shop at a small family-owned market or a huge superstore; whether to
find that dying breed of solo physician or use an HMO (that decision may be
made for you, depending on your health coverage); and whether to go with an
independent real estate agent or firm or a multistate operation.


Because of the real estate industry’s increasing consolidation, it has
become harder to find small independent agencies, but hardly impossible. If
that’s the route you favor, persist.


The tougher decision may be to determine which size firm is right for
you: a sole proprietor, a larger but still Chicago-based firm that has
multiple offices in the city and suburbs, or the giant national corporation or
franchise with in-house departments for mortgages, relocation, marketing. Each
type, according to real estate experts and homeowners, offers advantages and
disadvantages.


What it really boils down to is twofold. First, consider your needs and
personality and whether you feel more comfortable with an individual, a
boutique or a corporation. Second, be sure you’re in sync with the agent at
the firm you choose and know how good (attentive, available and
professional) he or she is because everyone, no matter the size of their firm,
has access to the same listings through MLS directories and the Internet.


“It’s really an issue that affects the agents more than the clients. Firms
are getting bigger because there’s no margin unless you buy and trade on
volume and because the cost of technology is so high you have to have many
offices to share costs,” says Reed Hagee Mitchell, whose two-office firm,
founded by her grandfather and great uncle in 1904, was acquired by Koenig &

Strey, which has 11 offices.


Nevertheless, the size of the firm will affect certain aspects of the
buying and selling process so it should be factored in, along with other
criteria. Following are some influences:


  • Name recognition. Certainly, the larger the firm, the more likely it is
    to have deeper pockets to advertise and promote its name, which gives some
    homeowners greater comfort in the same way that they prefer buying jeans from
    a Gap store rather than from a mom-and-pop shop that only offers brand X.


    It may be more important, however, to use a firm with such cachet when
    you’re a seller and want to reach a larger pool of buyers beyond your
    immediate boundaries. “The largest companies bring national and international
    exposure, which is particularly important when it comes to relocation,” says
    Elizabeth Ballis, who used to have her own company, Dayton Realty, but merged
    with Prudential Preferred Properties, a Chicago firm, which, in turn, merged
    with Minneapolis-based Burnet Realty to create The Prudential Burnet Realty.
    “I definitely lost listings as a small independent because I didn’t have the
    national exposure I now do.”


    It was for the same reason that Thomas Smith switched from an independent
    firm in Woodstock to a Re/Max franchise eight years ago. “A lot of clients
    were migrating here from the Northwest suburbs and sellers told me they wanted
    national exposure on TV and radio.”


    More important than national or international exposure, however, is strong
    name recognition within a community, according to Bruce Johnson-Reid of
    Jameson Realty. “With 45 to 50 agents, we’re large enough to cover all the
    neighborhoods and price ranges yet we’re small enough to be sure our agents
    are the best,” he says. “I think the top Chicago agents have generally come
    from Chicago companies that know the area and what good service means.”


    Yet, at the same time, consumers should not be fooled into thinking that
    name recognition is equivalent to fabulous service. Sometimes it is, sometimes
    it isn’t.


  • Office buzz. There’s definitely more chatting around the water cooler and
    on “caravans” to tour new listings when more agents are present. This can
    benefit buyers and sellers in markets when inventory is tight. “I have more
    opportunities to hear about properties, sometimes before they come on the
    market,” Ballis says.


    Greater communication also helps the learning curve, according to Jennifer
    Ames, who had been with Kahn Realty, which had seven offices, but who is now
    with Coldwell Banker/Kahn, which numbers 13 offices and whose number of agents
    shot to 600 from 325. “We learn from each other, at weekly sales meetings
    where we discuss properties and trends,” she says.


  • Bells and whistles. It’s far more likely that the bigger firms can afford
    the extras that you may feel essential to speed the process of buying or
    selling: slick marketing brochures and magazines with professional
    photographs, radio and TV ads, catered open-house lunches, full-page newspaper
    display ads, staff who put up and take down signs or manage company Web
    sites.


    But don’t think that agents with smaller-size firms or midsize Chicago
    offices never offer such perks. Many do when they deem it worthwhile,
    typically for higher-end listings. “I advertise my listings every week or
    every other week, though they’re 2- to 3-inch ads or classifieds rather than
    display ads,” says Jan Smith of J.A. Smith & Associates, who has a small
    staff. “I distribute flyers with pictures to brokers and hold open lunch
    houses for which I’ve made the desserts.”


    The major downside in this case falls on the agent in the form of a pared
    bottom line, the agents say. On the upside: agents in smaller firms are more
    likely to develop a highly focused ad or marketing campaign rather than a
    generic one cranked out by a corporate office in some distant city.


    Some questions to pose to any agent: What kind of marketing and advertising
    support will you give me? Where will it appear and how often? How large or
    small will it be and will pictures be included? How often will it be changed?


    And always bear in mind that there’s no universal agreement on whether
    marketing and advertising produce a buyer or seller. “Ninety percent of sales
    come from the MLS,” says Nancy Nagy of Sudler & Co., which is now owned, along
    with another Near North firm, Beliard, Gordon & Partners, by the same group of
    investors. The two firms number a total of 120 agents.


  • Availability and backup. Many firms have begun to insist that agents,
    whether with a small, medium or large office, be more available to clients by
    working full time. What’s typically different about the larger firms is that
    they can afford to have an office manager who answers agents’ phones when
    they’re not present and hook up customers with another agent in case of an
    emergency.


    Larger firms are also better able to afford a support staff to be sure all
    the i’s are dotted and t’s crossed on contracts to ensure a smooth closing, be
    up-to-date on the latest real estate legislation and be computer and Web-site
    savvy, all with the goal of allowing the agents to do what they do best: help
    buy and sell.


    But don’t think that just because a solo agent or one with a small firm
    doesn’t employ a staff and only has voice mail, he or she is less thorough or
    accessible. “It’s never more than an hour that someone can’t reach me,” says
    Ellen Benninghoven, who has successfully run her firm for more than 25 years
    with a support staff of zero.


    Some agents with smaller firms work out ingenious arrangements.
    Benninghoven belongs to a group of 10 solo brokers who meet monthly to help
    one another. Jane Domurot, who also works on her own, shares her office with
    another solo practioner. They cover for each other when one is sick or on
    vacation.
    The main goal is to offer a full menu of services, whether you’re on your
    own or aren’t, says Susan Fares of Baird & Warner, which has 31 Chicago
    offices with 1,000 agents.


  • Flexibility. Agents with smaller firms say they’re able to move
    faster–lower a commission to get a deal done, decide what kind of marketing
    strategy to deploy for a particular listing or to show a home at the last
    minute. “All of us live in the area so we can swing by a client’s home and
    pick up changes in a contract or show it,” says Andre Shields, one of four
    owners of Brush Hill in Hinsdale, which has 20 agents and focuses on that
    suburb.


    Thomas Smith agrees that he has given up some independence by buying a
    Re/Max franchise, but he says that doesn’t affect his clients. He thinks the
    advantages of having full-time agents who receive 100 percent of their
    commissions for their sales outweigh disadvantages. Re/Max agents cover thei
    operating costs.


  • Narrower focus. Because of a leaner staff, most smaller firms follow
    Brush Hill’s strategy and focus on a narrower geographic area, price range and
    type of housing. This can work for or against the client, depending on whether
    they know where they want to live. If so, they need to do more legwork to find
    an agent with the right speciality.


    Shields of Brush Hill views such specialization as a plus for her clients.
    “We serve them so well because we all live no more than two miles from the
    office. We know where the stores are in the area, what the state pays per
    student in the school system and how many National Merit Scholars it has,” she
    says. When she doesn’t have the right information or the right listing, she’s
    quick to refer prospective clients to other firms.


    And Benninghoven prefers to specialize in single-family homes, townhouses
    and condominiums in the city. “I’m not one to sell a high-rise apartment in
    the Mag Mile but I could,” she says.
    Agents with large firms beg to differ and say somebody in their office has
    the expertise desired without having to search for a referral. “We’re selling
    Lincoln Park, the Gold Coast, Ravenswood, Bucktown and are the biggest
    representatives of conversions and new products. We also sell expensive
    properties and ones in emerging neighborhoods,” says Johnson-Reid.


  • Trends. The larger firms with offices in other states are more likely to
    hear sooner about national trends that could ultimately affect the Chicago
    market. Currently, range pricing has taken hold in California. “Houses may be
    put on for between $400,000 and $600,000 rather than at a single price,” said
    Mitchell.


    But how critical is that to every buyer or seller’s needs? “It’s helpful,
    and we certainly hear about them more at a bigger firm, where we’ve got more
    minding the store and listening to what’s going on in the industry,” Ballis
    says.