Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
Don Wycliff argues that it is justifiable for a journalist to disclose a person’s religion when discussing the arguments he is making regarding public policy, even if this is on non-religious subjects (Commentary, Aug. 22).
Isn’t it more noble and ethical for a journalist in a democratic society to let a person’s arguments speak for themselves and be refuted by other facts and arguments, rather than invading someone’s privacy regarding his heritage?
