Chicagoans were starting to enjoy the season again. Then the stadium saga barged back in — first Arlington Heights, then a big lakefront concept and now the suggestion that northwest Indiana is suddenly “in the mix.”
Everyone understands the dynamic. The Bears want certainty and leverage. City and state leaders don’t want to get burned. Fans just want the adults in the room to stop stepping on a good thing.
Here’s the truth: Soldier Field has real constraints. The Bears’ checklist — modern amenities, year-round use, transportation and security that actually work, speed and certainty in approvals — isn’t unreasonable. The status quo isn’t enough.
But northwest Indiana isn’t a plan. It’s a tactic. And like most leverage plays, it carries a cost. It cheapens the civic relationship and puts strain on the one asset the Bears can’t replace with land or incentives — their identity as Chicago’s team.
So instead of letting this ricochet from headline to headline, Chicago should respond with something better. In Bears terms: good, better, best.
Good: Stop the clock from running out. Right now, stadium conversations sprawl across City Hall, the Park District, Cook County and Springfield. That fragmentation doesn’t just slow things down — it quietly kills deals.
The “good” solution is the bare minimum: one negotiating table, one accountable lead and a public calendar. Clear decision points. Clear rules. A defined window to resolve open questions.
Not a new authority. Not a study. Just coordination with a clock. What about appointing one, respected intragovernmental lead?
That alone would change the dynamic.
Better: A serious Chicago framework, not a shouting match. Let’s clear away the noise. Chicago and the state have already said they’re not paying to build a Bears stadium. That’s settled. Relitigating it wastes time.
What’s unresolved is everything around it: site control, infrastructure, operations and who carries risk when plans meet reality, especially in a city and state that don’t have spare dollars lying around.
The “better” move is a clean, public framework that says: The Bears build the stadium privately; the public side supports only defined, capped and phased needs that make a Chicago site function, such as transit operations, roads, utilities and public safety, using funding tools tied to actual use and value created, not open-ended exposure.
In other words: Help, yes. Blank checks, no. And everyone knows the rules going in.
Best: Solve Soldier Field and keep the Bears’ Chicago identity whole. This is where previous conversations get uncomfortable and where leadership actually matters.
Soldier Field isn’t just a venue. It’s a lease, obligations and real public risk. Any Chicago plan that ducks that reality isn’t serious.
The “best” approach is a two-track solution, pursued quickly and openly.
Track one: See if Soldier Field can be modernized enough — operationally and logistically — to meet realistic requirements. Not perfect. Functional.
Track two: If it can’t, evaluate a short list of Chicago alternatives on a real timeline and pair that with a defined exit-and-reuse plan for Soldier Field so taxpayers aren’t left holding the bag.
That’s the trade. If the Bears move on, they help close the book responsibly.
And it’s worth doing, because the Bears’ greatest asset isn’t a dome or a development district. It’s that “Chicago Bears” actually means something. Families. Neighborhoods. Generations. You can build a stadium anywhere. You can’t replicate that relationship.
The Bears aren’t just located in Chicago; they’re woven into the life of the city, shaped by its neighborhoods, its seasons and its stubborn sense of pride.
So here’s the ask.
To the Bears: Negotiate in good faith with the city that made you who you are.
To Chicago, Cook County and the state: Stop reacting and lead with a “good, better, best” mentality, with clarity and speed.
The Monsters of the Midway belong in the city of Chicago. Let’s make it happen.
Liam Stanton is a lifelong Chicagoan, entrepreneur and founder of The Chicago Style Project, a neighborhood advocacy group focused on bold, practical solutions for Chicago’s biggest challenges.
Submit a letter, of no more than 400 words, to the editor here or email letters@chicagotribune.com.
