Skip to content
Author
PUBLISHED: | UPDATED:
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

* Government says to study auditors recommendation

* Mine would be most expensive in Peruvian history

* Local foes reiterate opposition

LIMA, April 17 (Reuters) – A team of independent

environmental auditors said on Tuesday U.S.-based Newmont Mining

Corp should make “substantive improvements” to its $4.8

billion Conga project in Peru, which has been stalled by

community opposition.

The proposed gold mine, the biggest investment in the

history of Peruvian mining, would replace a string of alpine

lakes with reservoirs. Local protesters, led by the president of

the northern Andean region of Cajamarca, say it would bring

pollution or hurt scarce water supplies.

The Conga dispute has the highest profile of the more than

200 environmental conflicts that President Ollanta Humala is

trying to solve to avert delays on Peru’s $50 billion pipeline

of mining and energy projects.

“There’s no such thing as zero environmental impact. You

need to find a balance between economics, the environmental,

social needs and technical ones,” said Rafael Fernandez Rubio,

one of three European environmental experts hired by Peru’s

government to review Newmont’s mitigation plan for the mine.

Newmont has indicated it is willing to fine-tune its

mitigation plan for the project.

It has also said the reservoirs would provide steadier

supplies of water.

“Conga’s reservoirs would more than double the current water

storage capacity and would provide a reliable, year-round water

supply to downstream users, something they don’t currently have

as a result of the dry season,” the company said.

Prime Minister Oscar Valdes, who the president promoted from

interior minister in December and charged with quashing local

opposition to the mine, told reporters the government will now

review the 260-page report from the auditors, who analyzed the

water component of Newmont’s 7,000-page mitigation plan.

Some of the recommendations by the auditors could drive up

the costs of the project.

“It’s not our mission to say if the project is viable or not

… we’ve just tried to improve its technical aspects,” said

another auditor, Luis Lopez Garcia. “Some measures could be

implemented quite easily but others would require economic

studies to see if they make sense.”

Mines and Energy Minister Jorge Merino Tafur said the

independent review showed Peru was paying more attention to

environmental concerns after centuries of mining that often went

unchecked.

“I hope everyone understands that investments are very

important but only when you take into account factors like water

and sustainable development,” he said.

Gregorio Santos, the left-wing president of the region of

Cajamarca, who has defied Humala’s calls to let the mine be

built, reiterated his opposition to the project.

“The private sector in Peru must understand that you can’t

cause enormous damage to ecosystems in the pursuit of big

profits,” he said.