Skip to content
Author
PUBLISHED: | UPDATED:
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

By Mark Elkington

MADRID, May 7 (Reuters) – A two-week break following the

death of his grandfather has allowed Novak Djokovic to regain

his focus in time to defend his Madrid Open title this week, the

world number one said on Monday.

In his last competitive match, Djokovic was crushed 6-3 6-1

by Rafa Nadal in the Monte Carlo Open final, three days after

receiving the news about his relative.

He then pulled out of the Serbia Open in Belgrade saying he

had “no emotional energy left@ and needed to rest.

“I have had some time since my last tournament in Monte

Carlo to regroup and prepare for what’s coming up and I skipped

my hometown tournament because of the circumstances I was in,”

Djokovic told reporters.

“I didn’t find it was the right time to perform in another

tournament. I just wasn’t emotionally ready, so I got that extra

week to rest, and to prepare, and to practise and now what

happened is behind me, and I feel good.”

Djokovic’s defeat to Nadal in Monte Carlo was his first

reverse against the Spaniard in eight meetings, a run which

included beating the world number two in Madrid last year during

an outstanding 2011.

The lanky Serb said the rest had also done him good as he

sets out on a hectic schedule from now on, which includes a tilt

at a fourth Grand Slam title in a row in the French Open at the

end of the month.

“It is a very busy season now,” he added. “We have Madrid,

we have Rome, Roland Garros, Wimbledon and the Olympic Games.

It’s a lot of tournaments in a short period of time.”

Djokovic, like most of the competitors in Madrid, has been

questioned about the controversial blue clay courts being used

for the first time in a tournament.

“My opinion is that there are certain differences in the

blue clay when compared to the red clay,” he said, without

specifying.

“We can talk about it a lot but we already have it here in

front of us. The only thing that is a little disappointing from

the players’ point of view is that this was decided without the

players’ agreement.

“I’m not blaming the tournament, because they are fighting

for their own interests, but I am sure the ATP could have done

better job in representing the players rights.

“As I understand, we have the agreement for one year so

we’ll see what’s going to happen at the end of the week.”

(Reporting by Mark Elkington, editing by Ed Osmond)