Skip to content
Author
PUBLISHED: | UPDATED:
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

* Zardari to attend NATO summit focused on Afghanistan

* Pakistan’s role in Afghan security central

By Missy Ryan and David Brunnstrom

CHICAGO, May 19 (Reuters) – Pakistani President Asif Ali

Zardari arrived in Chicago on Saturday for a NATO summit to what

could be a chilly reception if a hoped-for deal allowing trucks

to again supply alliance troops in Afghanistan fails to

materialize.

While Western officials sought to portray Zardari’s presence

as a sign of improving NATO-Pakistan ties, possible friction at

the meeting underscores the challenges NATO countries face as

they struggle to ensure a stable future for Afghanistan after

Western toops withdraw.

Western leaders, who sometimes differ in their visions for

the best way to end the war, speak with one voice when they

describe Pakistan as the lynchpin to Afghanistan’s future

security – or continued conflict.

“We can’t solve the problems in Afghanistan without a

positive engagement of Pakistan,” NATO Secretary-General Anders

Fogh Rasmussen said hours before Zardari’s arrival, repeating a

refrain from NATO leaders that Pakistan must do more to act

against militants who launch attacks from the country’s tribal

areas.

Zardari’s decision to accept a last-minute invitation to

attend the summit in President Barack Obama’s home town was an

abrupt reversal after months of diplomatic estrangement.

Islamabad had made clear that Obama’s top aides were not welcome

in Pakistan.

It was also initially seen as a sign that Islamabad was on

the verge of reopening supply routes through Pakistan that are

crucial for NATO troops in Afghanistan.

But now it is far from clear that a deal on those supply

lines is imminent.

“It is time for them to make a decision,” said a U.S.

official. “Patience is not exhausted but it’s wearing thinner on

the U.S. side.”

In a sign of U.S. frustration, the White House said this

week that Obama had no plans to meet with Zardari individually,

although he is scheduled to meet with Afghan President Hamid

Karzai.

A RIFT NOT YET HEALED

Pakistan closed the supply routes in November after U.S.

aircraft killed 24 of its soldiers along the border with

Afghanistan. The incident caused a rift with the United States

that has not yet healed as the White House, gearing up for

November elections, has rebuffed Pakistan’s demands for an

apology.

The U.S. official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said

there have been no breakthroughs in talks on the supply routes

that many in the Obama administration had hoped would yield an

agreement at the summit, which begins on Sunday.

Yet U.S. and NATO officials said the mere fact that Zardari

would attend is a step forward.

“Obviously it’s important that they are taking part in the

summit as it’s a big show of support for Afghanistan,” said NATO

spokeswoman Oana Lungescu.

The Obama administration is eager to resume more productive

ties with Pakistan, whose role will be even more crucial as NATO

combat troops begin to withdraw ahead of a 2014 deadline.

“The goal is to re-establish a sense of normalcy in the

relationship and we’re getting there. It will take time,” the

U.S. official said.

The Obama administration accuses Pakistan of sheltering

militants who attack Karzai’s government and NATO troops.

Pakistan sees Afghanistan as vital to its security concerns, and

wants a say in the country’s future.

Islamabad defends its role in combating militants and notes

that many of its own soldiers have died in that fight.

“The point here is that Pakistan has cooperated in every

effort to hunt down, degrade, destroy and disable al Qaeda. And

your military acknowledges that,” Sherry Rehman, Pakistani

ambassador to the United States, told CNN on Friday.

Zardari’s government has voiced its willingness to reopen

the supply routes – if an agreement can be reached on fees that

will be paid on each shipment going into Afghanistan.

In an interview with the Chicago Tribune, Defense Secretary

Leon Panetta said it was unlikely the United States would

accept Pakistani requests to pay as much as $5,000 per military

shipment going into Afghanistan.

(Additional reporting by Phil Stewart. Editing by Christopher

Wilson)