Skip to content
Author
PUBLISHED: | UPDATED:
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

By Aaron Maasho

ADDIS ABABA, Aug 4 (Reuters) – Sudan and South Sudan late on

Friday broke off talks to end hostilities after failing to end

their disputes on border security and oil payments despite

Khartoum making some oil price concessions, officials said.

The U.N. Security Council had given the neighbours until

Thursday to resolve their conflicts or face sanctions. The

African Union (AU), which is hosting talks, is now expected to

extend the deadline to try bridge the differences, diplomats

said.

The two nations came to the brink of a full war in April

after border fighting escalated, the worst violence since South

Sudan became independent in July last year under a 2005

agreement that ended decades of civil war with Khartoum.

The messy divorce failed to mark the disputed border and to

define how much landlocked South Sudan should pay to export its

oil through the north. Oil is the lifeline of both economies.

The rivals appeared to make headway in the past few days

with both sides making concessions to end the oil dispute, which

saw Juba shut down its production in January after Sudan took

millions of barrels for what it said was unpaid fees.

South Sudan said last week it was willing to pay $9.10 and

$7.26 per barrel to export oil through two pipelines crossing

Sudan, alongside a $3.2-billion-dollar package to compensate for

the loss of most oil reserves to the South. It had previously

offered $2.6 billion.

Sudan itself lowered its demand to $15 a barrel per

pipeline, down from $32 a barrel, officials from both sides

said. It had until last week insisted on $36 a barrel.

But South Sudan’s top negotiator Pagan Amum said Khartoum

was still demanding too much.

“Sudan has been attempting to extort, to take advantage of

South Sudan as a landlocked country. Sudan has attempted to

impose very exorbitant transit fees,” Amum told reporters late

on Friday in Addis Ababa where talks take place.

Both sides have also failed to agree set up a demilitarized

buffer zone as a first step to improve border security.

Amum said international arbitration was now the best way to

find a solution for the disputed border regions.

“Also, we expect the (AU) to recommend that all the

remaining disputed and claimed areas be referred to

international arbitration,” Pagan said.

Sudanese officials confirmed talks had been broken off until

the African Union decided on further steps.

Sudan insists on a border security agreement first, before

agreeing on oil. Khartoum accuses South Sudan of supporting

rebels in two of its southern border states, claims some

diplomats find credible despite Juba’s denials.

South Sudan itself accuses Khartoum of often bombing its

side of the border. Although Khartoum denies this, Reuters

reporters have witnessed several such aerial attacks.

On Friday, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton urged

both sides to reach first a deal on oil to end hostilities.