Skip to content
Author
PUBLISHED: | UPDATED:
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

–Clyde Russell is a Reuters market analyst. The views

expressed are his own.–

By Clyde Russell

LAUNCESTON, Australia, Oct 18 (Reuters) – It’s probably not

going to be too hard to find bearish analysis of China’s

economic growth data, but much of this will miss the point.

While the 7.4 percent expansion in gross domestic product in

the third quarter from a year earlier was lowest since the first

quarter of 2009, all this tells us is what we already knew.

The Chinese economy has slowed more than had been hoped for

by the rest of the world and by more than the authorities would

have wanted.

But it’s also important to point out that a 7.4 percent GDP

outcome is far from a collapse, and still not quite the proof of

a hard landing that many fear.

It’s also not an outcome that supports the doom and gloom

that has crept into much of the commentary about commodity

demand from the world’s biggest buyer.

The easing in China’s growth certainly justified some of the

pullback in prices for iron ore, coal and some other

commodities, but maybe not to the extent that happened.

For example the price action in spot iron ore , which declined 22 percent in the third quarter,

would seem to suggest that the outlook now is worse than it was

in the aftermath of the 2008 global financial crisis and

recession.

While iron ore has recovered in recent weeks to trade around

$115 a tonne, it’s worth noting that the price since around the

beginning of August has been hovering around three-year lows.

So, are things in China as bad now as they were in the

aftermath of the 2008 crisis, and is the outlook for recovery

worse?

Even though the September quarter GDP numbers are largely an

exercise in understanding what is now history, they do provide

some interesting perspectives.

GDP growth fell steeply in China from 10.8 percent in the

second quarter of 2008 to 6.6 percent in the first quarter of

2009.

It then rebounded rapidly to 12.1 percent by the first

quarter of 2010, after which the slide to the current level has

been more gentle.

It may be the case that GDP will slip further in the fourth

quarter as it’s likely the government’s stimulus programme will

take time to work through the economy.

Assuming the stimulus works, GDP growth should once again

start rising by the first quarter of 2013 at the latest, but

this time the rebound is likely to less pronounced than in 2009,

as the spending measures are smaller and the decline in growth

wasn’t as bad in the first place.

And there are some tentative signs that the Chinese economy

was bottoming out in the third quarter.

Industrial production, retail sales and fixed-asset

investment all accelerated, and beat consensus forecasts to

boot.

Industrial output was up 9.2 percent, beating August’s 8.9

percent and the forecast for 9.0 percent growth, while retail

sales grew 14.2 percent, up from August’s 13.2 percent.

January to September fixed-asset investment rose 20.5

percent, beating the 20.2 percent consensus, which was the same

as achieved in the year to August.

So, where does this place the outlook for commodity demand

in China?

Is the scenario sketched by big miners like BHP Billiton and

Rio Tinto of a gradual recovery in demand growth more likely

than the alternative of extended ongoing weakness?

Both BHP, the world’s biggest mining company, and Rio, the

world’s number two iron ore producer, reported September quarter

production figures this week that were probably most noteworthy

for showing steady to moderately higher output.

In other words, there was nothing in the production reports

that spoke to a dramatic drop in demand, or even a looming

slump.

Obviously BHP and Rio will suffer revenue losses given the

decline in prices for iron ore, copper and coal during the

quarter.

While the decline in prices prompted both BHP and Rio, and

other resource companies, to shelve some projects, delay others

and cut costs by trimming jobs, in general the mining bosses

have maintained upbeat longer-term assessments.

“Markets remain volatile, but our business is resilient and

our operations are performing strongly,” Rio Chief Executive Tom

Albanese said in Tuesday’s quarterly activities report.

His BHP counterpart, Marius Kloppers, said he expects

China’s growth rate to stabilise around 7-8 percent over the

next 10 years, still enough to boost demand for iron ore by 650

million tonnes this decade, down from 850 million tonnes in the

prior 10 years.

The “demand shock” that drove commodity prices last decade

is over and the price boom is over, Kloppers said in notes for

speech on Wednesday in Brisbane.

This means the focus is on costs and capacity, he said.

In effect, what Kloppers and other mining executives appear

to be saying is that the company with the lowest costs is going

to be the winner, and that investors and traders are going to

have to learn to live in an environment where prices don’t rise

(and presumably fall) as rapidly as they have in recent years.

This is pointing to a more “steady as she goes” world for

Chinese commodity demand growth and the performance of the

resource companies geared to supplying that demand.