Skip to content
Author
PUBLISHED: | UPDATED:
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

* Estimate offers support to Obama’s position on taxing rich

* Republicans say report bolsters stance against any

increases

* S&P; analysts see 15 percent chance of “fiscal cliff”

happening

By David Lawder and Kim Dixon

WASHINGTON, Nov 8 (Reuters) – Allowing income tax rates to

rise for wealthy Americans, and not for the less affluent, would

not hurt U.S. economic growth much in 2013, the Congressional

Budget Office said on Thursday, stepping squarely into a dispute

between Republicans and Democrats over how to resolve the

so-called “fiscal cliff.”

The report by the authoritative non-partisan arm of Congress

is expected to fuel President Barack Obama’s demand for higher

taxes on the rich, part of his way of avoiding the full impact

of the expiring tax cuts and across-the-board spending

reductions set to begin in early 2013 unless Congress acts.

Republicans argue that any tax increases would be

devastating to the economy, particularly to small businesses,

and to U.S. employment rates.

They have held firm to their position that none of the cuts,

which originated during the administration of President George

W. Bush, should be allowed to expire.

Obama has also stuck to his position, with the White House

reiterating on Thursday that the president sees his election

victory on Tuesday as an endorsement by voters of his view on

higher taxes for the affluent.

“One of the messages that was sent by the American people

throughout this campaign is … (they) clearly chose the

president’s view of making sure that the wealthiest Americans

are asked to do a little bit more in the context of reducing our

deficit in a balanced way,” senior White House adviser David

Plouffe said.

UNCERTAINTY SCARING MARKETS

The disagreement over the tax cuts is a major roadblock to

any agreement in Congress, as it is coupled with the spending

issues also on the table.

The lack of progress in ending the standoff is spooking

global markets, which fell again Thursday in part because of

political uncertainty in Washington.

The concern was underscored by the credit rating agency,

Standard & Poor’s, which said on Thursday it sees an increasing

chance that the U.S. economy will go over the cliff next year,

though it added that it expects policymakers will probably

compromise in time to avoid that outcome.

Analysts at the agency now see about a 15 percent chance that

political brinkmanship will push the world’s largest economy

over the fiscal cliff.

With only five days remaining before the U.S. Congress

begins its post-election session, top political leaders in

Washington provided little new assurance Thursday that they can

act in time.

The Democratic White House did not respond publicly to an

initiative launched on Wednesday by the Republican Speaker of

the House of Representatives, John A. Boehner, to get talks

going to avoid the cliff.

Other leaders were consumed with putting their own

interpretation on the CBO report, highlighting the elements that

suited their position.

A statement from the Republican-controlled House Ways and

Means Committee said the CBO report “confirms that raising taxes

on all taxpayers will result in fewer ‘help wanted’ signs

hanging in the windows of businesses across the country. Job

creators agree and have made it clear that raising taxes will

result in a weaker economy and fewer jobs for the millions of

Americans struggling to find work.”

Democratic Sen. Max Baucus, chairman of the Senate Finance

Committee, said the CBO study “reaffirms the serious economic

risk America faces if we fail to deal with the fiscal cliff.”

The tax cuts were originally enacted during the

administration of President George W. Bush but were made

temporary in part to reduce the appearance of exploding the

already soaring U.S. deficit over the long term.

They were extended in 2010 for two years under an agreement

between Republicans and President Barack Obama, after

Republicans swept the mid-term elections that year and took

control of the House.

That extension is now running out, just as the trigger date

arrives for automatic spending cuts Congress legislated in 2011

as part of a deal to avoid a default on U.S. government debt.

VARIOUS SCENARIOS

The report from CBO laid out the economic effects of a

number of options that lawmakers will consider as they deal with

the fiscal cliff events.

The CBO said extending all of the tax cuts would boost U.S.

gross domestic product growth next year by a little less than

1.5 percentage points.

If the tax rates were extended only for individuals earning

less than $200,000 and couples earnings less than $250,000, CBO

said, growth would rise by 1.25 percent.

Wall Street estimates show third-quarter GDP growth was 2.8

percent. Unemployment is currently at 7.9 percent.

Eliminating the automatic spending cuts to military and

domestic programs would add back 0.75 percentage points of

growth, as would extending an expiring payroll tax cut and long-

term unemployment benefits that are expected to end next year,

the CBO said.

But the office also warned of consequences to taking such

actions without reducing deficits that have run at $1 trillion

in each of the past four years.

“CBO expects that even if all of the fiscal tightening was

eliminated, the economy would remain below its potential and the

unemployment rate would remain higher than usual for some time,”

the office said in its report.