Skip to content
Author
PUBLISHED: | UPDATED:
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

By Richard Valdmanis

BOSTON, Jan 13 (Reuters) – Boutique mint-maker VerMints can

keep its name, but its tins need to make clear the candies are

not actualy made in the Green Mountain state, according to a

settlement announced by Vermont’s attorney general on Monday.

Vermont sued VerMints in 2012, arguing that the company

mislabeled its packaging as “Vermont’s All Natural Mints” when

the pastilles are actually produced in the Canadian province of

Quebec.

“Use of the term ‘Vermont’ has great economic value, and

many businesses go to the expense of sourcing their ingredients

and processing within the state in order to market their

products as Vermont products,” Vermont Attorney General William

H. Sorrell said in a news release.

VerMints will also pay $65,000 in the settlement, most of it

in the form of a donation to the Vermont Foodbank.

VerMints, which sells its pastilles in small tins brightly

painted with images of rolling green mountains, autumn leaves,

and falling snow, said it was considering re-incorporating

somewhere else as a result of the dispute.

“If they want to pat themselves on the back by punishing

small businesses, that’s fine,” VerMints President Gary Rinkus

told Reuters by telephone. “We seriously thinking about going to

another state.”

The company incorporated in Vermont in 2000.

Rinkus added that the ‘Ver’ in VerMints did not refer to the

state. Instead it is short for Veritas – the Latin word for

truth.

“These are true mints,” he said. “They can’t make me change

the name.”

(Writing by Richard Valdmanis; Editing by Jonathan Oatis)