Skip to content
Author
PUBLISHED: | UPDATED:
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

* Annan’s deputy urges swift deployment of extra observers

* China says seriously studying idea of sending observers

* Sarkozy calls for setting tp ‘humanitarian corridors’

* ‘Friends of Syria’ ministers to meet in Paris

* Shooting after U.N. observers leave town

(Adds U.S. and Russian U.N. envoys)

By Oliver Holmes and Louis Charbonneau

BEIRUT/UNITED NATIONS, April 19 (Reuters) – Syria and the

United Nations signed an agreement on Thursday on terms for

hundreds of observers to monitor a ceasefire, but fierce

diplomatic wrangling lies ahead to persuade the West the mission

can have the authority and power to ensure peace.

A handful of U.N. observers are already in Syria monitoring

a week-old truce that has failed to stop bloodshed. The question

of whether the mission can expand while violence continues is up

in the air. A crowd mobbed the head of the advance party on

Thursday, some demanding the death of President Bashar al-Assad.

The U.N. Security Council – divided between Western

countries that want to topple Assad and Russia and China, which

support him – must agree the proposal to send a larger observer

force. Russia made clear it wants the 15-member council to move

now to expand the small mission, while the West is hesitating.

Senior officials from France, the United States, Britain and

other Western states met in Paris with Middle East countries

including Turkey, Qatar and Saudi Arabia. They agreed the truce

was the “last hope” of avoiding an all-out civil war. But Russia

snubbed an invitation and derided the “Friends of Syria”

meeting.

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton told the group in

Paris that they should push for a Security Council resolution to

impose U.N. sanctions on Assad if he blocked an adequate peace

monitoring mission. She said Russia, while still likely to veto

such a measure now, might support one if violence went on.

In the first progress report since the council authorised

the arrival of the initial observers on Saturday, U.N.

Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon said Syria had not fully withdrawn

troops and heavy weapons from towns as agreed, failing to send a

“clear signal” about its commitment to peace. He also

recommended raising the number of observers to up to 300.

On Thursday, the Security Council was briefed by mediator

Kofi Annan’s deputy, Jean-Marie Guehenno. According to council

diplomats, Guehenno acknowledged risks of deploying unarmed

observers while violence persists, but said their presence could

help by changing the political dynamics on the ground.

This view was shared by Russian U.N. Ambassador Vitaly

Churkin, who said “we need to respond to (Ban’s) request, to his

proposal to authorize the full-fledged monitoring mission.”

“For a cessation of violence to be firmed up, the further

deployment of the monitoring mission could play a very important

role,” he said.

U.S. Ambassador Susan Rice, however, said some countries had

concerns about the fact that Damascus had not ended the violence

and had not granted the observers full freedom of movement.

FIG-LEAF FEARS

Assad’s opponents fear that a small observer mission with a

weak mandate would act as little more than a fig leaf for the

government, blocking more robust intervention to halt a 13-month

crackdown on cities that have risen up against Assad.

But the main opposition group, the Syrian National Council,

welcomed the observers’ mission and said in a statement that

more monitors must be deployed to serve as witnesses.

“Their presence allows the civilian population to reassert

its right to peaceful demonstration,” the group said.

U.S. and European diplomats on the council have suggested

Syria’s lack of full compliance with the ceasefire might make it

hard for them to back an expanded mission. Russia and China will

approve a mission only under a part of the U.N. charter that

gives Assad’s government a veto over the observers’ mandate.

Discussion has focused on a force of at most a few hundred

people, a tiny fraction of the size of peacekeeping forces have

normally deployed to war zones.

“This preliminary agreement … aims to facilitate the task

of the observers within the framework of Syrian sovereignty,” a

statement from the Syrian Foreign Ministry said.

The U.N. advance team in Syria has already had a taste of

the unrest. On Wednesday, gunfire erupted close to the

observers, who had been swarmed by anti-Assad protesters near

Damascus.

On Thursday the team went to a rural area near the town of

Deraa, where the uprising against Assad began. Amateur video

footage posted on the Internet showed the team’s head, Colonel

Ahmed Himmiche, wearing a U.N.-style turquoise bullet-proof vest

as he walks through a crowd of protesters.

A demonstrator wraps his arm around Himmiche and shouts:

“The people want the execution of Bashar.” Himmiche, who must

act as a neutral observer, looks ill at ease.

The United Nations estimates Assad’s forces have killed more

than 9,000 people in the uprising. Syria says foreign-backed

militants have killed more than 2,600 soldiers and police.

NO AIRCRAFT

The last mission by outside monitors to observe a peace plan

in Syria, sent by the Arab League, collapsed in failure in

January after just a month. That team said it could do little as

long as Assad’s forces controlled its movements.

Ban has asked for any new U.N. mission to have its own

aircraft so it can travel independently, but Syria says it will

provide transport. Ban told reporters U.N. aircraft were not

covered in the preliminary deal and were still being discussed.

The anti-Assad Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said

Syrian forces opened fire in the town of Herak, in southern

Syria, shortly after the U.N. team left the area on Thursday.

It added that six people had been killed around Syria on

Thursday, including two during army shelling in Homs.

Regarding Ban’s recommendation for 300 observers, Syrian

Foreign Minister Walid al-Moualem said 250 was a “reasonable

number”, adding they should be from countries such as China,

Russia, Brazil, India and South Africa – all more sympathetic to

Damascus than are the West and the Arab League.

Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Liu Weimin said Beijing

was “seriously studying” participating.

RUSSIA SCOLDS ‘FRIENDS OF SYRIA’

The informal “Friends of Syria” group said in a statement in

Paris: “Every day that passes means dozens of new Syrian

civilian deaths.

“It is not time to prevaricate. It is time to act… Though

fragile, the Annan mission represents a last hope.”

French Foreign Minister Alain Juppe told the meeting: “We

cannot wait, time is short … The observers must be deployed

fast and must be able to act without obstacles.”

Clinton told the meeting that the Security Council should

adopt “travel, financial sanctions, an arms embargo, and the

pressure that that will give us on the regime to push for

compliance with Kofi Annan’s six-point plan.”

Russia, angered by a U.N. resolution that led to war in

Libya last year, opposes sanctions and says the West and Arab

powers are failing to give due weight to Assad’s argument that

he is fighting Islamist militants.

“When the so-called Syrian group of friends meet and

somebody says ‘Now we’ll assess how Assad implements Kofi

Annan’s plan’, it is a wrong attempt,” Russian Foreign Minister

Sergei Lavrov said at a NATO meeting in Brussels. “We cannot

privatize (the plan) and we will not let it happen.”

Clinton said of her talks with Lavrov in Brussels: “He was,

as usual, very intent upon laying responsibility on all sides,

and in particular on the opposition. But he also has recognized

that we are not in a static situation but a deteriorating one.”

Western powers have little appetite for Libya-style military

intervention in Syria.

French President Nicolas Sarkozy, facing the first round of

an uphill re-election battle on Sunday, said the solution for

the crisis in Syria would be to set up a humanitarian corridor

that would allow the opposition to survive.

Assad “wants to wipe Homs off the map just like Gaddafi

wanted to destroy Benghazi”, said Sarkozy, whose lead in backing

Libya’s rebels against Muammar Gaddafi last year won him praise

at home and abroad. “We called this meeting to gather all those

who cannot stand that a dictator is killing his people.”

(Additional reporting by Dominic Evans, John Irish and Daniel

Flynn in Paris, Tom Miles and Stephanie Nebehay in Geneva, Ben

Blanchard in Beijing, Sebastian Moffet and Arshad Mohammed in

Brussels, and Michelle Nichols in New York: writing by Oliver

Holmes; editing by Peter Graff and Mohammad Zargham)