Skip to content
Author
PUBLISHED: | UPDATED:
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

* SEC: company lied about asset value, use of IPO proceeds

* CEO, ex-CFO are charged in connection with alleged fraud

* SinoTech chairman also accused of stealing $40 mln

* Latest in crackdown on accounting at Chinese companies

By Sarah N. Lynch

WASHINGTON, April 23 (Reuters) – U.S. securities regulators

charged China-based SinoTech Energy Ltd and its

senior executives with misleading investors on Monday, part of

an effort to crack down on accounting problems at Chinese

companies listed in the United States.

The Securities and Exchange Commission’s civil suit, filed in

a U.S. district court in Louisiana, alleges that the oil field

services company and its executives “continuously and

intentionally misled investors” about the value of its assets

and how it used the $120 million in proceeds from its November

2010 initial public offering.

The SEC alleges that SinoTech Chief Executive Officer

Guoqiang Xin, 47, and former Chief Financial Officer Boxun

Zhang, 35, were responsible for the alleged fraud.

The SEC also charged the company’s chairman, Qingzeng Liu,

50, saying that he stole $40 million from a SinoTech bank

account between June 30, 2011 and August 2011.

He then “stood by silently,” the SEC said, as the company

battled public accusations of fraud by claiming the company had

$93 million in its bank accounts.

He also “confessed” to making the $40 million withdrawal

from the company’s primary bank account with the Agricultural

Bank of China, the SEC alleges. The withdrawal never appeared in

the company’s books and records, and the company still retained

Liu as its chairman.

The investor protection agency is seeking financial

penalties and to bar the executives from serving as officers or

directors of U.S. public companies.

An attorney for the company declined to comment.

SEC PROBING CHINESE COMPANIES

For more than a year now, the SEC has been probing

accounting irregularities and other problems at Chinese

companies that are listed on U.S. stock exchanges. The

accounting issues have led auditors to many of the companies to

resign, and have also prompted U.S. stock exchanges to delist or

halt trading.

The SEC has brought at least six cases against Chinese

companies that listed in the U.S., including Longtop Financial

Technologies and Puda Coal. The SEC is also

trying to force a Chinese Unit of Deloitte & Touche to hand over

documents that may assist the SEC in its investigation of

Longtop.

SEC enforcement director Robert Khuzami has previously told

Reuters that the Justice Department is also investigating the

issue.

SinoTech used to be listed on the Nasdaq market, but its

shares were halted in August 2011, the SEC said.

The company’s auditor resigned in September 2011 and

withdrew its audit opinion. The auditor was not named in the

suit, but SEC filings show it was Ernest & Young Hua Ming.

Nasdaq then suspended trading in October 2011, and delisted

the stock on Jan. 6, 2012. The shares now trade

over-the-counter.

“SinoTech’s brief life as a public company in the U.S.

markets has been rife with falsehoods,” said David Woodcock, the

director of the SEC’s Fort Worth Regional Office. “Investors

deserve the utmost honesty and transparency from companies and

their officers when they tap public markets in the United

States.”

According to the SEC, SinoTech promised it would use money

from its IPO to acquire lateral hydraulic drilling units, but in

fact acquired far too few and then lied about the number it had

and how much the units were worth.

These alleged misrepresentations were then repeated over and

over again in numerous financial filings and press releases, the

SEC said.

The units were obtained through a sole supplier located in

Lake Charles, Louisiana. The SEC says the company contracted to

buy 15 units for $18.9 million, but SinoTech only paid $16

million. The supplier only delivered 11 units because the

company did not pay the full amount.

Afterwards, the SEC says the company continued to overstate

the value of its equipment. That in turn affected the company’s

earnings report.