Skip to content
Author
PUBLISHED: | UPDATED:
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

By Tabassum Zakaria and Susan Cornwell

WASHINGTON, April 29 (Reuters) – No one talks tougher

against prostitution than the U.S. military.

Even in countries where prostitution is legal, military

personnel violating a seven-year-old Department of Defense

policy against paying for sex face up to a year in jail and

dishonorable discharge if caught.

Officers and troops are taught about the links between human

trafficking and prostitution. They also face country-specific

instructions at bases like the U.S. installation in South Korea,

where the policy describes prostitution as “cruel and

demeaning.”

But the involvement of U.S. military personnel and Secret

Service agents in a raucous April outing with prostitutes in

Cartagena, Colombia, has underscored the gaps between the

written policies and real-life experiences at military

assignments around the world.

While the Secret Service has acted promptly and openly, even

announcing Friday new ethics training and policies for traveling

agents, the military has stayed mostly mum about how it is

addressing possible violations of its prostitution rules.

After the Colombia scandal broke, initial attention focused

on the dozen agents from the Secret Service, a civilian agency,

for fear safety of the president or other officials might have

been compromised. Eight agents have since left the service, one

had his security clearance revoked and three were cleared.

‘INCOMPATIBLE’ WITH MILITARY VALUES

Last week, Senator John McCain, the top Republican on the

Senate Armed Services committee, criticized the Pentagon for

offering too little information about the errant behavior of

personnel who were helping prepare for a Cartagena summit visit

by President Barack Obama.

Unlike the Secret Service agents, who were ordered to return

home and were swiftly disciplined, the military personnel were

initially confined to quarters in Colombia for what the Pentagon

called “curfew violations.” The Pentagon says those involved

have had their security clearances suspended while an

investigation proceeds.

Defense officials have said that moving the military

personnel from Colombia before the summit there was ended would

have been disruptive to their mission. The military service

members had been sent to Cartagena as part of advance

preparations for a summit that was attended by President Barack

Obama.

Defense officials have also said they cannot speculate

publicly about what disciplinary actions may be taken or discuss

details of the allegations, saying this could jeopardize the

integrity of the investigation.

But last week a Pentagon spokesman pledged to keep McCain

and other lawmakers as informed as possible as the investigation

proceeds.

Senator Lindsey Graham, a Republican on the armed services

committee, said he doubts that the military is enforcing its

strict prostitution rules.

“The honest truth is probably no,” said Graham, a former Air

Force lawyer.

McCain said that while the Senate committee examined issues

of sexual assault after the 1991 Tailhook scandal involving

allegations of sexual abuse by Navy and Marine pilots, the panel

has not been called upon to investigate the use of prostitutes.

He rejected the notion that patronizing prostitutes is a fact of

military life.

“I certainly did not believe that. Ever,” he said. “And I

spent 26 years in the military.”

The military toughened its prostitution rules in 2005 after

President George W. Bush signed an executive order adding

patronizing prostitutes to the Manual for Courts-Martial.

The order spelled out offenses and penalties and gave the

military a tough enforcement tool – if it chose to use it – for

behavior that, as Graham said, had “been around military bases

as long as there has been a military.”

Lawrence Korb, a former defense official, said that while he

has heard stories of wayward military personnel since his time

in Vietnam, “we’ve never heard anything about the Secret Service

before.”

Korb, now a senior fellow at the Center for American

Progress, said it is unclear how often the military services

impose the harsh written policies for personnel using

prostitutes.

“I’ve never seen anybody go to jail,” he said.

Nevertheless, training continues. Both the Pentagon and the

State Department, which also has tough internal policies on

prostitution, teach personnel that prostitution is often a form

of human trafficking, with strong ties to underworld crime.

The military’s general awareness and law enforcement

training can be found on its website at http://ctip.defense.gov/

Country-specific training also stresses criminal links.

A U.S. Forces Korea policy states: “Prostitution and human

trafficking shall not be facilitated in any way.” It further

says that hiring prostitutes is “incompatible with our military

core values.”

Graham said one reason for the effort is that military

personnel assigned to other countries must adapt to local

customs and morals. “If there was an effort to visit prostitutes

in Afghanistan, we would come down hard. Simply because it’s a

cultural no-no in Afghanistan, it would bring wrath upon us,” he

said.

Graham said the Senate Armed Services Committee should look

into the issue further.

“The commonality seems to be when the Secret Service and the

military get together, in kind of exotic locations, things are

going bad,” Graham said. “So the military and Secret Service

need to address: what is it about these trips?”

(Additional reporting By David Alexander; Editing by Marilyn W.

Thompson and Jackie Frank)