Skip to content

Breaking News

Author
PUBLISHED: | UPDATED:
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

April 30 (Reuters) – A Pennsylvania school district on

Monday moved to quash a subpoena asking for psychological and

other records of one of the 10 boys Penn State coach Jerry

Sandusky is accused of sexually abusing.

The subpoena targeting the school district superintendent

raised objections last week from prosecutors who accused

Sandusky’s lawyer, Joe Amendola, of embarking on a “fishing

expedition” for information to defend Sandusky.

Prosecutors also criticized Sandusky’s lawyer for revealing

the name of Victim 1 in the subpoena, which authorities redacted

before including it in the court file.

Victim 1 is among 10 boys Sandusky is charged with sexually

abusing between 1994 and 2008. A grand jury indictment said

Sandusky performed oral sex on him more than 20 times when he

was 13 or 14 years old, had Victim 1 perform oral sex on him one

day and also touched the child’s genitals.

Sandusky was barred from Victim 1’s school district,

headquartered in Lock Haven, Pennsylvania, not far from Penn

State, after the child’s mother reported the allegations to the

school.

Sandusky, 68, who has maintained his innocence, is under

house arrest in the scandal that rocked the world of collegiate

sports and led to the firing in November of Penn State’s

president Graham Spanier and legendary football coach Joe

Paterno, who died of lung cancer in January.

At Centre County Court in Bellefonte, Pennsylvania, where

Sandusky’s trial is set to begin on June 5, lawyers for Kelly

Hastings, superintendent of the Keystone Central School

District, moved to quash the subpoena, calling it “unduly

broad.”

The subpoena seeks the complete school record of Victim 1,

outlining 13 different categories of information including all

IQ testing, disciplinary records, psychological diagnosis,

attendance records and even report cards.

“The Defendant must articulate a reasonable basis for the

request as utilizing subpoenas to compel production of documents

for inspection or for a fishing expedition is improper,” the

school district lawyers said.

Asked to respond to the school district’s motion, Amendola

said in an email to Reuters, “We’ll address Keystone Central’s

motion in court in due course.”

(Editing by Eric Walsh)