Skip to content
Author
PUBLISHED: | UPDATED:
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

* China-built aircraft carrier seen by 2015

* China military build-up still driven chiefly by Taiwan

* US eyes more steady military-military ties with China

(Adds China comment, paras 2, 10-11)

By Paul Eckert and Phil Stewart

WASHINGTON, May 18 (Reuters) – The Pentagon said on Friday

it believes China spent up to $180 billion on its military

buildup last year, a far higher figure than acknowledged by

Beijing, and it accused “Chinese actors” of being the world’s

biggest perpetrators of economic espionage.

China rejected the report as irresponble, saying the United

States was spreading a “China military threat” theory.

The Pentagon, in its annual report to Congress on China’s

military, flagged sustained investment last year in advanced

missile technologies and cyber warfare capabilities and warned

that Chinese spying threatened America’s economic security.

“Chinese actors are the world’s most active and persistent

perpetrators of economic espionage,” the report said.

“Chinese attempts to collect U.S. technological and economic

information will continue at a high level and will represent a

growing and persistent threat to U.S. economic security.”

David Helvey, acting assistant secretary for defense,

stopped short of saying the Chinese government was behind cyber

intrusions, and instead repeated that they were “from China.”

“As we learn more about them, we have a better understanding

of the nature of the operations and that helps us to say with

greater confidence that some of these are in fact coming from

China,” he told reporters in a briefing on the annual report.

Analysts said espionage and aggressive acquisition of

dual-use technology could accelerate China’s military

modernization.

The United States could be in for a surprise in 2013-15 if

“China successfully exploits it extensive cyber-espionage

efforts and unveils new weapons systems that are on par with

U.S. systems,” said Capital Alpha Partners LLC, a investment

analysis group, in a research note on the Pentagon report.

China expressed its opposition to the report for painting

its military development as a threat, saying it was for

defensive purposes and not aimed at any country or target.

“China is committed to maintaining and promoting the peace,

stability and prosperity in the Asia Pacific region, and even

the world,” Foreign Ministry spokesman Hong Lei said in a

statement. He called on the United States to halt the annual

publication of the reports and do more to promote Sino-U.S.

military relations.

The report was the first by the Pentagon since President

Barack Obama last year launched a policy “pivot” to reinforce

U.S. influence across the Asia-Pacific region, even as planned

belt-tightening shrinks the size of the military in many other

parts of the world.

That pivot has fanned unease in China, with some People’s

Liberation Army officers calling it an effort to fence in their

country and frustrate Beijing’s territorial claims. The Pentagon

report identified China’s rapid development of Anti-Access/Area

Denial weaponry, such as missiles targeting aircraft carriers,

as a potential threat to U.S. movements in Asia.

STEALTH FIGHTER, AIRCRAFT CARRIER

China has advertised its long-term military ambitions with

shows of new hardware, including its first test flight of a

stealth fighter jet in early 2011 and its August launch of a

fledgling aircraft carrier – a refitted former Soviet craft.

The Pentagon noted that some components of China’s first

indigenously produced carrier may already be under construction.

It said that carrier could achieve operational capability after

2015.

“China likely will build multiple aircraft carriers and

associated support ships over the next decade,” it said.

It would be 2018 before China’s stealth fighter would have

“operational capability,” said Helvey, citing the need to field

more aircraft, integrate weapons and conduct training.

China announced in March that 2012 outlays on the PLA wil

reach 670.3 billion yuan for 2012 (about $106 billion), an 11.2

percent increase over 2011. That follows a near-unbroken string

of double-digit rises across two decades.

The Pentagon suggested that China’s 2011 figure was an

underestimate, noting “poor accounting transparency and China’s

still incomplete transition from a command economy.”

“Using 2011 prices and exchange rates, (the U.S. Department

of Defense) estimates China’s total military-related spending

for 2011 ranges between $120 billion and $180 billion,” the

Pentagon said.

“Some of their nuclear forces modernization occurs

off-budget, some of the research and development monies that go

to their defense industry we also think comes from a different

budget … some of the foreign acquisitions comes from a

different account as well,” said Helvey.

In contrast, U.S. lawmakers are now debating a bill seeking

$554 billion in base defense spending for the 2013 fiscal year

beginning in October and $88.5 billion for the Afghan war and

other overseas operations.

Taiwan, the self-ruled island that China claims as a

renegade province to be recovered by force, if required,

“remains the principal focus and driver of much of China’s

military investment,” the report said.

Despite an ongoing improvement in China-Taiwan relations

under Taipei’s Beijing-friendly President Ma Ying-jeou, “China’s

military shows no sign of slowing its efforts to prepare for

Taiwan Strait contingencies,” said Helvey.

The report underscored the Pentagon’s desire for more steady

and continuous military-to-military relations with China, noting

that “this aspect continues to lag behind other aspects of the

broader bilateral relationship.”

But Helvey noted that although China canceled some military

exchanges after the September 2011 U.S. announcement of arms

sales to Taiwan, dialogue continued and the two powers have set

a “robust” schedule for 2012, which has already seen a U.S.

visit by Defense Minister Liang Guanglie.

The 43-page report is posted at

http://www.defense.gov/pubs/pdfs/2012_CMPR_Final.pdf

(Additional reporting by Don Durfee in Beijing; Editing by Ron

Popeski)