Skip to content
Author
PUBLISHED: | UPDATED:
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

* Roche proposes advisory board to examine all Tamiflu data

* Follows lengthy fight by scientists and medical journal

* Offer comes as EU drugs agency meets to discuss openness

By Ben Hirschler

LONDON, Nov 22 (Reuters) – Roche has offered an

olive branch to scientific critics in a bid to end a bitter row

over blockbuster flu drug Tamiflu that has led to calls for a

boycott of the Swiss drugmaker’s products.

Tamiflu has been approved by regulators worldwide and

stockpiled by many governments in case of a global outbreak –

but some researchers claim there is little evidence it works and

have lobbied since 2009 for Roche to hand over all its data from

clinical trials.

Sales of the drug hit close to $3 billion in 2009, due to

the H1N1 swine flu pandemic, although they have since declined.

Roche’s pharmaceuticals head said on Thursday he had written

to the Cochrane Collaboration, a non-profit group that reviews

trial data to assess the value of drugs, offering to set up a

multi-party advisory board to review all the Tamiflu data.

The board of experts from academia and private institutions,

including Cochrane critics, would then agree on what analyses

were useful in assessing Tamiflu’s public health role.

“We think that would be an appropriate, fair and transparent

way of handling this debate,” Daniel O’Day said in an interview.

O’Day said complete transparency had to be balanced against

the need to protect patient privacy, respect commercial

sensitivity and ensure the scientific merit of any statistical

analysis.

He stopped short of matching a promise from rival

GlaxoSmithKline to make patient-level data from all

company-sponsored clinical trials available on a routine basis.

Roche said it had not handed over the full collection of

data requested by Cochrane because the group refused to sign a

confidentiality agreement.

Cochrane, meanwhile, has accused Roche of stonewalling and

urged a boycott of the company’s products until it publishes the

missing data. Its campaign to force Roche’s hand has been backed

by the respected British Medical Journal.

EU AGENCY PROMISES OPENNESS

The new attempt by Roche to break the deadlock comes as

regulators and healthcare experts meet in London to discuss ways

to increase transparency over clinical trials.

As Reuters reported in July, the European Medicines Agency

(EMA) aims to open its data vaults to systematic scrutiny, after

a ruling by the European Ombudsman that keeping data secret is

not compatible with the public interest.

Guido Rasi, executive director of the EMA, told the London

meeting on Thursday that the question now was “how” to publish

clinical trials data not “if” it should be released.

The move puts the EMA ahead of the U.S. Food and Drug

Administration (FDA) in terms of data transparency.

The EMA stance is also forcing drug companies to review how

far they can keep information they hold on medicines under

wraps.

Most companies have committed in recent years to publishing

results of clinical trials, either in journals or online, but

that openness has not so far extended to the raw data that lies

behind those trials.

Britain’s GlaxoSmithKline, however, broke ranks last

month when it announced that patient-level data from its

clinical trials of approved and failed drugs would be made

available to other researchers.

Roche’s O’Day said his company responded to requests for

such data on a case-by-case basis, provided scientists were

prepared to sign confidentiality agreements if needed, but this

did not mean all data should be released as a matter of course.

“To what level data will be shared proactively and

constantly is something we need to discuss,” he said.

A Roche spokesman said Cochrane had acknowledged receipt of

its proposal for a Tamiflu advisory board but had not given any

immediate response.

(Reporting by Ben Hirschler; Editing by Erica Billingham)