Skip to content
Author
PUBLISHED: | UPDATED:
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

* Decree orders retrial of Mubarak-era officials

* Shields Islamist-dominated constitutional assembly

* Says Mursi decisions not open to legal challenge

By Marwa Awad

CAIRO, Nov 22 (Reuters) – Egyptian President Mohamed Mursi

triggered controversy on Thursday by issuing a decree likely to

lead to retrials of Hosni Mubarak and his aides but which was

compared to the ousted leader’s autocratic ways.

As well as ordering retrials for Mubarak-era officials

responsible for violence during the uprising against his rule,

the decree shielded from legal challenge an Islamist-dominated

assembly writing Egypt’s new constitution.

It gave the same protection to the upper house of

parliament, dominated by Islamists allied to Mursi, and assigned

the president new powers that allowed him to sack the

Mubarak-era prosecutor general and appoint a new one.

It stated that all decisions taken by Mursi until the

election of a new parliament were exempt from legal challenge.

Presented as a move to “protect the revolution,” the decree

won immediate praise from Mursi’s allies but stoked fears among

secular-minded Egyptians that the Muslim Brotherhood and its

allies aim to dominate the new Egypt. It seemed likely to deepen

the divisions that have plagued the post-Mubarak era.

“These decisions will feed discord in Egyptian politics and

will be far from creating a favourable climate for restoration

of economic growth,” said Mustapha Kamal Al-Sayyid, a professor

of political science at Cairo University.

Leading liberal politician Mohamed ElBaradei, writing on his

Twitter account, said Mursi had “usurped all state powers and

appointed himself Egypt’s new pharaoh.”

But Mahmoud Ghozlan, spokesman for the Brotherhood,

described the move as “revolutionary and popular.”

The decree appeared to remove any uncertainty still hanging

over the fate of the assembly writing the constitution. The body

has faced a raft of legal challenges from plaintiffs who dispute

its legality.

Critics say its popular legitimacy had been further called

into doubt by the withdrawal of many of its non-Islamist

members, who had complained their voices were not being heard.

The constitution is a crucial element in Egypt’s transition

to democracy. New parliamentary elections will not be held until

the document is completed and passed by a popular referendum.

The decree also gave the body an additional two months to

complete its work, meaning the drafting process could stretch

until February, pushing back new elections.

‘VERY DANGEROUS’

A number of political forces condemned the decree and said

the president “robbed the people and institutions of all the

rights and powers,” in a statement they issued later at night.

The move to order a retrial of Mubarak-era officials will

likely be popular among those who feel that revolutionary

justice has yet to be served.

Mubarak, 84, was sentenced to life in prison in June for

failing to prevent killings that occurred during the uprising

that led to his Feb. 11, 2011 downfall. He has been held in a

prison hospital since his sentence was handed down.

Critics have faulted the process by which he and other

officials were put on trial. One of the problems, they say, was

that the Mubarak-era prosecutor general had not been replaced.

Mursi had tried to replace Abdel Maguid Mahmoud, the man

sacked on Thursday, in October. The move kicked up a storm of

protest from judges who said the president had exceeded his

powers and was threatening their independence.

Mursi got around the problem this time by giving himself the

power to appoint a new prosecutor general, Talat Abdullah, whose

swearing-in was shown on state television.

In a statement broadcast on state TV, Abdullah vowed to

“work with colleagues at the public prosecution’s office to

uphold justice and eradicate oppression.”

Ali said a new prosecution office would be established to

“protect the revolution” and made up of judges who would be

given powers to order investigations and collect evidence.

Heba Morayef, Egypt director for Human Rights Watch, said:

“Egypt needed judicial reform and the public prosecutor is a

Mubarak holdover, but granting the president absolute power and

immunity is not the way to do it.”