Skip to content
Author
PUBLISHED: | UPDATED:
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

* “Deep conceptual gap persists in the region”

* U.S. had feared talks could be forum to bash Israel

WASHINGTON, Nov 23 (Reuters) – Talks planned for next month

on banning nuclear weapons in the Middle East will not take

place, the United States said on Friday, a development likely to

anger Arab states but please Israel.

The State Department announced that the mid-December

conference on creating a zone free of weapons of mass

destruction, or WMD, would not occur and did not make clear

when, or whether, it would take place.

Earlier this month, diplomats told Reuters that the talks

were likely to be postponed, rather than canceled outright.

“As a co-sponsor of the proposed conference … the United

States regrets to announce that the conference cannot be

convened because of present conditions in the Middle East and

the fact that states in the region have not reached agreement on

acceptable conditions for a conference,” State Department

spokeswoman Victoria Nuland said in a statement.

Nuland said that “a deep conceptual gap persists in the

region” on how to handle regional security and arms control,

adding that “outside states cannot impose a process on the

region any more than they can dictate an outcome.”

The plan for a meeting to lay the groundwork for the

possible creation of a WMD-free Middle East was agreed to at a

May 2010 conference of 189 parties to the 1970 nuclear

Non-Proliferation Treaty, or NPT.

The United States, feared the conference, which was to be

held in Finland, could be used as a forum to bash Israel, a

concern likely to have increased after eight days of fierce

Israeli-Palestinian fighting that ended with a ceasefire on

Wednesday.

Iran and Arab states often say Israel’s presumed nuclear

arsenal poses a threat to Middle East peace and security. Israel

and Western powers see Iran as the main nuclear proliferation

threat. Tehran denies any atom bomb ambitions.

The State Department said it would keep working to try to

bring about a meeting, adding such a gathering must take into

account the security of all the states in the region and operate

on the basis of consensus – effectively guaranteeing Israel, and

everyone else, a veto.

“We would not support a conference in which any regional

state would be subject to pressure or isolation,” Nuland said,

in a clear reference to U.S. concerns that other participants

might gang up on Israel.

U.S. and Israeli officials have said a nuclear arms-free

zone in the Middle East could not be a reality until there was

broad Arab-Israeli peace and Iran curbed its nuclear program.

Like nuclear-armed India and Pakistan, Israel has never

signed the NPT. It neither confirms nor denies having nuclear

arms, although non-proliferation and security analysts believe

it has several hundred atomic weapons.

Even if the talks eventually occur, Western diplomats and

others expect little progress any time soon due to the

deep-rooted animosities in the region, notably the Arab-Israeli

conflict and Israeli concerns about Iran’s nuclear program.

The Islamic state is in a stand-off with world powers that

suspect it is seeking the means to produce nuclear arms. Israel

has not ruled out military action against Iranian nuclear sites.

(Reporting By Arshad Mohammed; Editing by Peter Cooney)