Skip to content
Author
PUBLISHED: | UPDATED:
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

By Sarah N. Lynch and Andy Sullivan

WASHINGTON, May 13 (Reuters) – The researcher whose report

prompted a spike in health stocks last month appears to have

relied on lobbyists rather than U.S. government insiders who had

direct knowledge of a pending healthcare decision, according to

emails reviewed by Reuters.

The messages could help bolster Height Securities LLC’s

claim that its analyst was essentially doing what reporters,

lobbyists and others in Washington do every day: trying to

figure out what the government is going to do next.

The small research shop is among the brokerages, law firms

and other “political intelligence” operations that have drawn

scrutiny over concerns that they may have facilitated insider

trading by passing along tips that moved markets.

Height Securities has drawn inquiries from the Securities

and Exchange Commission and Iowa Republican Senator Charles

Grassley since it correctly predicted on April 1 that President

Barack Obama’s administration would keep certain medical payment

rates in place, prompting a spike in healthcare stocks before

the official announcement came out.

The analyst who prepared the report, Justin Simon, reached

out to a healthcare lobbyist shortly before he issued his

market-moving research bulletin, the emails show.

“I’m tracking down a rumor … any chance you have heard

that POTUS/WH have stepped in” to keep the Medicare rates in

place, Simon asked, using shorthand for Obama and the White

House.

Other documents indicate the lobbyist, whose name was

redacted from the report, is Stacey Hughes, a founding partner

of the Nickles Group who used to work for several Republican

senators. She could not be reached for comment.

“That is the rumor,” Hughes responded, adding that it was “a

little more likely” that the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid

Services would not cut payment rates for healthcare providers

after the acting head of the agency that oversees the two

programs, Marilyn Tavenner, met with staffers of the Senate

Finance Committee.

Hughes wrote that the White House could decide to keep the

current payment rates for the popular health programs as a way

to convince lawmakers in the Senate to make her post permanent.

“Just my opinion,” Hughes wrote.

Simon released his report about an hour later, prompting a

spike in health stocks that stood to benefit from the decision.

“Did you see what I did to the stock in the final 30 min of

trading?” Simon wrote Hughes after his report came out. “We

heard the same story from like 30 people so we went with it.”

A Height spokesman said the emails reviewed by Reuters

confirm that Simon based his report on multiple sources of

information, rather than a single Obama administration insider

who would have had direct knowledge of the decision.

“We appreciate the fact that the released documents validate

our claim all along – Height did not receive or disseminate

material non-public information,” the spokesman said.

That appeared unlikely to satisfy Grassley, who wants

“political intelligence” firms to be subject to the same

disclosure laws as lobbyists.

Grassley’s office said Height was not cooperating as much as

they would like and appeared to be giving inconsistent

information.

“Senator Grassley continues to try to unwind the events

leading up to the stock spike on April 1 and previous trading

anomalies in the prior two weeks,” spokeswoman Jill Gerber said.

Michael Asaro, a lawyer who represents Simon, declined to

comment.