Skip to content
Author
PUBLISHED: | UPDATED:
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

* Edith O’Brien was involved in MF Global fund transfers

* Refused to testify before Congress on her role

* O’Brien appeared at CFTC in 2010 defending safeguards

* Said customer safeguards work “extremely well”

By Sarah N. Lynch and Aruna Viswanatha

WASHINGTON, April 13 (Reuters) – MF Global’s

assistant treasurer, now a key figure in the mystery over the

bankrupt firm’s missing customer money,

praised how well customer safeguards work one year before the

firm’s collapse.

Edith O’Brien was a panelist at a Commodity Futures Trading

Commission public meeting held on Oct. 22, 2010, to discuss the

protection of individual customer funds, especially if a

customer defaults.

According to a transcript of the meeting, O’Brien told the

other panelists that they were taking “an extraordinarily myopic

view of the current safeguard structure that operates in America

and has effectively worked to the best of my knowledge for

years.”

O’Brien appears to have played a critical role in the firm’s

final days, as the futures brokerage suffered a liquidity crisis

and desperately shifted funds before filing for bankruptcy on

Oct. 31, 2011.

Investigators including the CFTC and Justice Department are

probing why more than $1 billion in customer funds are missing,

and whether the firm raided customer money to meet the firm’s

needs – a major violation of industry rules.

Former MF Global Chief Executive Jon Corzine has

specifically named O’Brien as someone who gave him assurances

that fund transfers were proper.

O’Brien has not spoken publicly about her version of events,

and invoked her constitutional right against self-incrimination

at a congressional hearing last month.

Neither the firm nor its executives have been formally

charged with wrongdoing.

At the 2010 CFTC meeting, O’Brien went on to say that there

are multiple layers of safeguards for customer funds, including

rules segregating customer funds from firm funds, and rules

restricting what firms can do with customer funds while they are

holding them.

“So, as we continue the conversation this afternoon, I want

everyone to consider the fact that there’s a greater framework

at hand here, one that has actually worked extremely well,” she

said according to a transcript on the CFTC’s website.

A lawyer for O’Brien declined to comment about O’Brien’s

remarks at the CFTC meeting.

BATTLE OVER PROTECTIONS

The CFTC was holding the roundtable, in part, to discuss a

requirement in the 2010 Dodd-Frank financial oversight law that

calls for firms to legally protect each individual account for

swaps customers, and not just protect a pool of accounts.

How to devise such a customer fund protection scheme for

swaps was a major source of contention.

At the CFTC’s roundtable in 2010, futures brokerages like MF

Global argued for using the customer fund protection model used

in the futures market, where all of the customer money is pooled

together in “omnibus” accounts.

But pension funds and money managers have strongly opposed

that idea, saying that pooling the money together puts customer

collateral at risk. They have argued in favor of having

individual, separate customer accounts.

Futures brokerages have pushed back against individual

account segregation, with the Futures Industry Association

arguing it could cost firms nearly $100 million a year.

The CFTC struck a compromise and finalized a rule earlier

this year that allowed for firms to pool swaps customer funds

together, but with strong record-keeping requirements to

identify the accounts.

On another proposal regarding stricter customer safeguards,

Corzine, a former U.S. senator and a governor of New Jersey,

personally lobbied the CFTC.

He participated in phone calls in which he warned about a

proposal to put tighter limits on “in-house” transactions in

which futures brokerages use customers’ funds to make

proprietary trades for their own accounts.

MF Global and other industry players succeeded in delaying

the proposal, which the CFTC ended up finalizing in December,

after MF Global collapsed.

(Reporting By Sarah N. Lynch and Aruna Viswanatha; Editing by

Karey Wutkowski and Tim Dobbyn)