Skip to content
Author
PUBLISHED: | UPDATED:
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

By Caroline Valetkevitch

NEW YORK, May 4 (Reuters) – U.S. companies are seeing plenty

of green this quarter, but they are raising red flags about the

future.

Earnings growth is running at nearly 8 percent for the first

quarter, better than expected, but are issuing negative outlooks

for the second quarter by a ratio of 3.3 to 1, the worst ratio

since late 2008, according to Thomson Reuters data.

That ratio this week briefly rose to 3.9 to 1, the worst in

more than a decade.

It is a sign that executives are worried about the U.S. and

global economies, and helps explain why stocks have failed to

react vigorously when companies come out with results ahead of

what Wall Street expects.

“Companies are looking out there and saying we don’t know

what’s going to happen in Europe. The U.S. economy is growing at

a modest pace, but there’s a lot of uncertainty around it. So…

they’re behaving as if they’re nervous,” said Jonathan Golub,

chief equities strategist for UBS in New York.

The gulf between expectations and results has been a common

theme in the U.S. corporate profit recovery, and has usually led

to a higher-than-average percentage of companies beating

expectations.

In past quarters, this was welcomed by investors, but it is

coming as less of a surprise given the habitual caution ahead of

results and the lackluster commentary from companies.

S&P; 500 first-quarter earnings growth is currently 7.8

percent, up sharply from 3.2 percent just before the reporting

period began. However, second-quarter growth estimates have

declined in that time, and third-quarter forecasts are just

marginally higher.

Companies have good reason to be cautious. The U.S. recovery

has been sluggish. After fourth-quarter growth of 3 percent at

an annual rate, first-quarter growth has slowed to 2.2 percent,

and the second quarter also suggests sluggish growth.

Dow component Procter & Gamble cited sluggish U.S.

growth in cutting estimates for its fiscal year ending in June,

with Chief Executive Bob McDonald telling analysts: “What’s

happening is, obviously, you’ve got a higher fuel price, you’ve

got other macroeconomic headwinds like housing and other

things.”

Overseas growth is lackluster. China is slowing, and euro

zone surveys suggest contraction in both the manufacturing and

services sector.

Low visibility across the global economy has kept outlooks

from rising with earnings growth, Barclays analysts wrote in a

research note.

This has companies holding back on spending not just in

hiring, but in areas such as advertising and research and

development, Golub said. Private U.S. employers added just

130,000 jobs in April, the Labor Department said Friday, short

of expectations.

DISCONNECT POINTS TO WORRY AHEAD

The disconnect between expectations and results is apparent

in the current earnings period. With results in from more than

400 of the S&P; 500 components, 68 percent have beaten profit

expectations, above the 62 percent long-term average, Thomson

Reuters data showed.

Investors have caught on to the fact that low expectations

mean more earnings beats, and as such, have not been rewarding

companies with big stock gains.

Shares of companies beating estimates outperformed the S&P;

500 by an average of 65 basis points in the week after earnings,

Goldman Sachs analysts said in a research report. That compares

with an average of 250 basis points last quarter, they said.

Yet the pattern of a high percentage of companies beating

estimates could be repeated in the second quarter.

Second-quarter earnings forecasts have barely budged, so a large

percentage of companies could vault a low bar again, Golub said.

S&P; second-quarter earnings growth is seen at 8.9 percent

versus an April 1 forecast of 9.2 percent, while third-quarter

growth is seen at 5.6 percent versus April’s 5.3 percent.

The S&P; sector with the worst negative-to-positive guidance

ratio so far is health care, at 8 to 1, according to

Thomson Reuters data.

St. Jude Medical Inc Chief Executive Dan Starks,

following the company’s better-than-expected first quarter

results and a weak forecast for the second quarter, told

analysts: “We really think there is value to erring on the side

of being conservative, if we are going to err at all.”

In the tech sector, which has given more guidance than any

other sector, Juniper Networks, Qualcomm,

Lexmark International and even Apple all gave

lower-than-expected outlooks.

On the Juniper’s conference call following results, CEO

Kevin Johnson said “there are still significant headwinds in

Europe… we’ve seen service providers be very cautious in their

capital expenditures.”

Other sectors, like the financials, have offered almost no

guidance on future earnings.

Analysts at Keefe, Bruyette and Woods raised questions about

the quality of earnings for the banks. Companies in that sector

have seen fewer upward revisions, with KBW analysts saying

earnings have been boosted by unsustainable factors, including

mortgage banking and trading income.

A thin silver lining is this: While more companies are

guiding lower, the rate at which they are cutting estimates is

easing, said Key Private Bank Director of Research Nick Raich,

suggesting “second quarter estimates are probably too low.”

The question is whether fourth-quarter estimates are still

too high and will come down to reflect the current worries.

Fourth-quarter growth is forecast at 15.9 percent, Thomson

Reuters data showed.

“Where we’re going to hit a roadblock is, expectations start

to get high in the end of 2012 and the beginning of 2013,” Raich

said.

(Reporting By Caroline Valetkevitch; Additional reporting by

Edward Krudy; Editing by Tim Dobbyn)