Skip to content
Author
PUBLISHED: | UPDATED:
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

By Jonathan Spicer

NEW YORK, May 15 (Reuters) – Regulators first raised

concerns in April about trading positions that led to a $2

billion-plus loss at JPMorgan Chase & Co, and they posed

questions to senior management at the bank, a source familiar

with the situation said on Tuesday.

The U.S. Federal Reserve – JPMorgan’s primary regulator – as

well as the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the UK

Financial Services Authority were all involved in monitoring the

bank’s portfolio that suffered the big derivatives trading loss,

the source said.

The shocking loss at one of Wall Street’s most respected

banks has raised questions over how aware regulators were of the

risky trading, and how well they understood it, given that the

Fed and the OCC have supervisors physically embedded at JPMorgan

offices.

Though JPMorgan Chief Executive Jamie Dimon revealed the

loss last week, media reports in early April said that a

UK-based trader at the bank, dubbed the “London Whale,” was

playing a dominant role in certain markets.

“It was on regulators’ radar from April,” when they began

asking questions of the bank’s senior managers and risk

managers, said the source, who requested anonymity.

Representatives of JPMorgan, the Fed, and the FSA declined

to comment. An OCC representative was not immediately available

for comment.

The Federal Reserve Bank of New York has up to 40

supervisors “embedded” at JPMorgan, as well as teams at the

other primary dealers it oversees. The OCC has teams of similar

size at the banks it regulates, while the FSA, which is

responsible for UK-based banking, does on-site supervision but

not embedding.

The Fed, whose reputation was tarnished by the financial

crisis, last year ramped up the number of supervisors embedded

at banks and assigned more senior officials to lead the on-site

teams.

“I think it’s good to have them on-site. It does enhance

their understanding of what is going on,” Sheila Bair, former

chairman of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp, told Reuters in

Washington.

“But I do think that regulatory understanding of these

complex trading and derivatives strategies is lagging,” she

added. “If JPMorgan Chase can’t understand the risks they were

taking, how can you expect examiners to do it?”

Last week, Dimon said JPMorgan kept regulators as informed

as possible.

“You should assume that we keep our regulators up to date,”

the CEO said in a conference call with analysts and reporters.

“Sometimes we don’t give them great information because we

didn’t have great information.”

The Fed is examining whether JPMorgan is taking similar

risks elsewhere in the sprawling bank, while the OCC is also

examining the losses, the two agencies said on Monday.