Skip to content

Breaking News

Author
PUBLISHED: | UPDATED:
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

* Traders court Madoff customers for right to recoveries

* Some Madoff victims sell claims for immediate cash

* Prices bounce around amid thin trading

* Traders watch court rulings for impact on claims prices

By Caroline Humer and Sue Zeidler

May 30 (Reuters) – After Bernard Madoff’s fraud unraveled in

late 2008, Yale Fishman was courted by Wall Street traders

seeking to buy his claim to assets that could be recovered from

the mess. After three years of ignoring their calls, he finally

said yes.

Fishman, an estate planner in Woodmere, New York, and a

former Madoff investor, cut a deal with a trading firm to sell

part of his bankruptcy claim in the long-running case. He said

he sold his $1.1 million claim for $800,000, or about 73 cents

on the dollar, in late December.

“I held it for a while, but they keep calling you up and

soliciting you,” he said. “And I figured I should sell it

because I was planning for my kids,” said Fishman, whose sale

could not be independently verified.

As in many bankruptcies, the collapse of Madoff’s financial

empire spawned a mini-market of trading in the rights to any

potential recoveries. Bankruptcy claims trading in the Madoff

case has moved in fits and starts since Madoff was arrested,

with claims currently trading in the range of 60 cents on the

dollar, according to levels quoted by traders.

Recent setbacks by the court-appointed trustee trying to

recoup assets on Madoff victims’ behalf – combined with

frustration over the trustee’s legal and other fees, which to

date total more than $550 million and counting – are encouraging

some former Madoff customers to unload their claims. Most

original Madoff claims sellers are ordinary investors, not the

lenders, debt holders or vendors who are the typical sellers in

other claims-trading situations.

A bankruptcy claim is essentially an IOU that gives the

holder the right to a portion of any assets later recovered. The

seller gets cash upfront rather than potentially waiting years

for a payback, while the buyer – typically a hedge fund or bank

– pays a discount to the face value of the claim in hopes of

ultimately recouping more.

Claims trading has long been a Wall Street niche. Past

examples of significant claims-tradings markets include those

stemming from the collapse of Enron Corp. and Lehman Brothers

Holdings Inc. More recently, buyers have been snatching up MF

Global Holdings Ltd customer claims.

While claims trading is always a bet on the value of the

bankrupt estate, trading in Madoff claims has become almost a

pure bet on what the trustee, lawyer Irving Picard, can recover

through his myriad court battles.

So far, Picard has won settlements of $9.1 billion through

lawsuits against groups and individuals he has accused of

turning a blind eye to Madoff’s crimes and profiting from his

scheme. Much of that money is tied up in litigation over payout

calculations, however, and cannot be distributed. So far, Madoff

investors have only received payments of $330 million.

Picard’s office has said Madoff customers ultimately could

get a full recovery of the more than $17 billion in approved

claims. Picard spokeswoman Amanda Remus declined to comment on

claims-trading activity or prices.

Remus said the trustee and his legal team have gotten “an

extraordinary result” through their work “in reconstructing from

nothing the facts and scope of the Madoff fraud and achieving

record recoveries.” She also said the trustee’s fees are paid

through funds from the Securities Investor Protection Corp., a

nonprofit group that charges fees to broker-dealers, not from

recoveries intended for Madoff victims.

It’s unclear how many Madoff investors have sold their

claims, or at what prices. Because Madoff’s firm, Bernard L.

Madoff Investment Securities LLC, was unwound under the auspices

of SIPC instead of through a Chapter 11 bankruptcy, there is no

legal requirement for claims trades to be made public.

Bankruptcy claims trade in an over-the-counter market made

up of small brokers who specialize in finding claims and traders

from broker-dealers such as the Seaport Group, CRT Special

Investments LLC and Macquarie Group. They call and send emails

to potential buyers about the price and size of claims being

bought and sold, meaning there are no official price quotes.

Buyers of Madoff claims have included Deutsche Bank and

hedge funds Fortress Group, Monarch Capital and Silver Point

Capital, according to traders involved in the transactions.

Fortress did not respond for comment, while Deutsche, Monarch

and Silver Point declined to comment.

PICARD’S EFFORTS

Picard’s efforts to recover funds have included lawsuits

against an array of banks, wealthy individuals and Madoff family

members.

The defendants, who include Madoff’s brother, Peter, and son

Andrew, have countered that they, too, were betrayed by Madoff

and that the trustee waited too long to bring some of his

claims. Picard expanded his lawsuit, filed in U.S. Bankruptcy

Court in Manhattan, against the family members earlier this

month to $255 million, from $226 million.

In one of his earliest and biggest successes, Picard won

approval in January 2011 of a $7.2 billion settlement with

Madoff investor Jeffry Picower. Optimism among traders grew that

the payback for claims holders would be large, and Madoff claims

at that point traded above 70 cents on the dollar, according to

traders who have tracked the prices.

“People thought he was going to roll through this,” Joseph

Sarachek, managing director at CRT, said of Picard.

Then, in September 2011, the trustee sustained some big

setbacks, triggering a drop in claims prices to the

mid-50-cents-on-the-dollar range, according to traders. U.S.

District Court Judge Jed Rakoff in New York ruled that Picard

could only reach back to the last two years of the fraud in

pursuing his “clawback” lawsuits against Madoff customers who

withdrew more money from their accounts than they had deposited.

The judge was considering whether Picard could seek funds

from New York Mets owners Fred Wilpon and Saul Katz, who were

investors with Madoff, and the ruling limited the trustee’s

potential recoveries. The Mets owners later settled litigation

brought by the trustee.

In November, another federal judge in Manhattan threw out

most of the trustee’s nearly $20 billion lawsuit against

JPMorgan Chase & Co and a $2 billion case against UBS AG

.

Trading in Madoff claims can be thin, and prices have

bounced around sharply, according to market participants.

Fishman, the Madoff victim who sold a claim in December, said he

executed his trade when prices climbed from earlier levels.

Since then, prices have settled to around 60 cents on the

dollar, said Robert Gallivan, a senior managing director at

Macquarie.

But none of these price movements or legal developments

matter much anymore to Madoff investors who have shed their

claims. Selling the claims has given some victims, who had

entrusted their life savings to the man they thought was a

financial genius, a measure of closure.

“I think people understand as time goes on that this is not

a fast process,” said Burt Ross, a Madoff victim in Malibu,

California, who said he sold his claims some time ago.