Skip to content
Author
PUBLISHED: | UPDATED:
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

* With House in Republican hands, roadblocks remain

* Opportunity to build on healthcare success

* First order of business – the fiscal cliff

By Andy Sullivan

WASHINGTON, Nov 7 (Reuters) – Barack Obama swept into the

White House four years ago as an agent of change. The nation’s

first black president won re-election on Tuesday as a

steady-as-she-goes defender of a new status quo.

With a second term, Obama also wins a second chance.

Obama may never become the unifying figure he promised to be

in the 2008 race, but he will have four more years to try to

enact sweeping changes that could affect the United States for

decades.

It won’t be easy. Obama has been blocked in Congress ever

since the 2010 elections, when Republicans took control of the

House of Representatives, and that’s not likely to change.

Breaking through the gridlock will be just as difficult.

Obama’s modest second-term agenda so far illustrates his

diminished clout in Washington. Republicans retained their hold

on the House of Representatives and they have a large enough

presence in the Senate to tie that chamber in knots. His narrow

victory is likely to leave them unimpressed.

Right off the bat, he faces a potential crisis known as the

“fiscal cliff” – tax increases and automatic spending cuts that

threaten to throw the country into another recession.

While he brought U.S. combat in Iraq to a close and is

drawing down in Afghanistan, he will have to rein in Iran’s

nuclear ambitions, along with the chance of an Israeli

counterstrike.

Inevitably, the president may bring to his second term the

hard lessons of his first.

“He was a figure who promised to transform the way politics

worked,” said Julian Zelizer, a presidential historian at

Princeton University. “I don’t think people think that anymore.

It’s not just less faith in him, it’s less faith in what the

political system can do.”

If Obama did not change Washington the way many hoped, he

can build on many notable successes.

He won a historic expansion of healthcare that had eluded

Democratic presidents since the 1940s. Though voters like many

of its components, they have been less enamored of “Obamacare”

as a whole. He now will have the opportunity to prove its worth.

The same may be said for the Dodd-Frank financial reforms,

which aim to rein in some of Wall Street’s worst excesses.

Obama’s legislative attempt to curb global-warming emissions

died in the Senate, but he can continue the effort through

regulation. He can also continue an effort to create millions of

“green” jobs, which has so far fallen far short of its goals.

He came nowhere near his goal of cutting trillion-dollar

budget deficits. He will rejoin that battle as soon as this

week.

But for many voters, these issues were pushed aside by the

economy, which plunged into a deep recession in the final months

of 2008.

Here, too, Obama can point to success: his 2009 stimulus

created millions of jobs and blunted the impact of the worst

recession since the 1930s. The domestic auto industry, on the

verge of collapse in 2009, has been restored to health.

The country avoided economic catastrophe but robust growth

remains elusive. As Obama won re-election, 23 million Americans

were either unemployed, underemployed, or too discouraged to

look for work.

Obama’s cautious approach to the housing crisis did little

to stem an epidemic of foreclosures or help those left deep in

debt by plunging real-estate values. A follow-up stimulus

stalled in Congress as the administration focused on its

healthcare and Wall Street reforms.

NOT A BACKSLAPPER

Though Obama was the first sitting member of Congress to win

the presidency since President John F. Kennedy in 1960, his

relations with Capitol Hill were problematic at best.

A private person by nature, Obama shied from the

backslapping and arm-twisting that is often needed to advance an

agenda in Washington. Democratic lawmakers grumbled privately

that he cared little for their political concerns.

Republicans opposed his initiatives in an unprecedented

manner, providing few, if any, votes for his major initiatives.

In the Senate, action slowed to a crawl as Republicans threw up

a record number of procedural hurdles.

The dysfunction came to a climax during the debt-ceiling

battle of 2011, which brought the country to the brink of

default. Consumer confidence plummeted and credit-rating

agencies issued a historic downgrade of the country’s debt.

It’s unclear whether Obama could have done much to break the

logjam on his own.

Congressional scholars Norm Ornstein and Thomas Mann, who

have studied Washington for 40 years, argued in their book “It’s

Worse Than It Looks” that the Republican Party has become an

ideologically extreme “insurgent outlier” with little interest

in the compromises needed to run a vast and diverse country.

But Republicans would have been willing to work with Obama

when he took office had he shown some independence from his own

party, said former Bush aide Tony Fratto.

“That was a missed opportunity – I thought this particular

president, at this particular time, had a real, unique

opportunity to turn the tables on Congress,” Fratto said.

Obama’s relationship with the business community has been

rocky as well. Corporate leaders complained that their White

House meetings seemed more like photo opportunities than policy

sessions.

Wall Street turned against the administration in the wake of

the 2010 financial reforms and even prominent Democratic figures

like J.P. Morgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon accused Obama of

demonizing the financial industry.

The “grand bargain” that would set U.S. finances on a

sustainable path will remain as elusive as ever, as investors

continue to snap up U.S. debt at rock-bottom interest rates and

lawmakers face little pressure from their constituents to make

the sorts of painful concessions that will be needed to reach a

deal.

Republicans might determine that it is in their best

interest to cooperate on an immigration overhaul, but they will

want to negotiate on their terms.

The economy could give Obama a much-needed tailwind in his

second term as employment, consumer confidence and a range of

other measures indicate that the recovery may finally be taking

hold.

An improved economy could solve some of Obama’s problems by

narrowing budget deficits, putting more Americans back to work

and vindicating many of the decisions he made in his first year

in office.

For a president who has seen much of his first term hijacked

by the sluggish economy, that would be an ironic turn of events.

“The 2008 presidential election had the effect of raising

expectations to a level that would have been very difficult to

satisfy even in the best of circumstances. And the circumstances

have not been the best,” said William Galston, a Brookings

Institution scholar and former policy adviser to President Bill

Clinton.