Skip to content
Author
PUBLISHED: | UPDATED:
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

NEW YORK, Jan 30 (Reuters) – A home builder has asked a

federal appeals court to throw out a National Labor Relations

Board ruling, citing Friday’s decision by another appeals court

that President Barack Obama violated the U.S. Constitution when

he filled three board positions using recess appointments in

January 2012.

The argument, made in a letter filed Tuesday by home builder

D.R. Horton, Inc with the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of

Appeals in New Orleans, appears to be one of the first attempts

to extend Friday’s ruling from the District of Columbia circuit

court to other recess appointments made prior to 2012.

The District of Columbia court said Friday that the Senate

was not truly in recess in January 2012 when Obama named the

three new members, a decision that could significantly limit the

power of the president to sidestep Congress when pushing future

federal nominees.

The letter from D.R. Horton, however, calls into question

whether the decision could impact past appointments as well.

The company claims Obama’s recess appointment of Craig

Becker to the labor board in 2010 should also be considered

invalid, relying on the D.C. circuit’s reasoning.

Not counting Becker, the board had only two members, less

than a quorum, when it issued a ruling on Jan. 3, 2012, in the

Horton case prohibiting companies from requiring their workers

to waive their right to bring collective action, the company

claimed.

Different circuit courts are not obligated to follow one

another’s rulings.

Nancy Cleeland, a spokeswoman for the board, declined to

comment. Ron Chapman, a lawyer for D.R. Horton, did not

immediately have a comment.

Other companies have already begun citing the D.C. circuit’s

decision in challenging NLRB rulings made after Obama’s three

appointments.

Entergy Mississippi, a unit of Entergy Corp, filed a

brief Monday in the 5th circuit arguing in part that a NLRB

ruling in August 2012 concerning whether its dispatchers are

bargaining-unit workers should be invalidated because of the

recess appointments.

The case is D.R. Horton Inc. v. NLRB, U.S. Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit, No. 12-60031.