Skip to content
Author
PUBLISHED: | UPDATED:
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

By Sharon Bernstein

LOS ANGELES, May 23 (Reuters) – California unveiled prices

on Thursday that consumers will pay for a selection of health

plans offered through the state under the Affordable Care Act,

providing a glimpse into how health care reform may look as it

is rolled out across the nation.

Under the federal health care reform law, Californians who

do not get or cannot afford health insurance through their jobs

can buy coverage through an exchange, at a group rate negotiated

by state regulators.

The cost to a 40-year-old who needs coverage would vary from

about $40 to $300 per month for a mid-level plan, depending on

the person’s income. Some young adults, who are less expensive

to cover, could pay nothing, depending on how much they earn.

The prices in California, along with those announced in

Washington, Vermont and other states, show that premiums under

Obamacare can be more affordable than had previously been

thought. Consumer advocates welcomed the new exchange.

“It’s a revolutionary improvement to move from a broken

market where people are charged by how sick they are, to a

competitive market where people pay what they can afford, based

on a percentage of their income, on a sliding scale,” said

Anthony Wright, executive director of advocacy group Health

Access.

“Most consumers buying coverage in the individual market

will get financial help and see their premiums go down,” he

said.

The sweeping federal reform law known as Obamacare seeks to

extend health insurance to many of the 49 million Americans

without it, and alter how care is delivered so as to curb what

has been an inexorable rise in healthcare spending.

Congressional Republicans who oppose the law had warned that

high premiums would sink Obamacare as the uninsured would not be

able to afford coverage even with federal subsidies.

Even the modest rates announced Thursday do not really

signal that the program will work, said California Republican

Assemblyman Dan Logue.

“This is like a shell game to me,” said Logue, co-chair of

the assembly health committee, who predicted that taxes would go

up to pay for the subsidies, forcing other prices to rise.

“They’re not going to tell you that you’re going to pay for

it in your gas or your food or going to the show,” he said.

About a dozen states have set up these exchanges, or large

group plans, which are a key element of the massive national

health reform effort. Several have already released rates for

monthly premiums, and most say the cost will not go up as high

as skeptics had feared.

In California, a 40-year-old who makes less than four times

the federal poverty level – that is, $95,000 for a family of

four or $46,000 for an individual – would pay as little as $40

per month for a mid-level plan in which about 70 percent of

medical costs and all preventive care is covered. This excludes

additional costs to cover children or a spouse.

The same plan for a person who makes too much to qualify for

a subsidy would run about $300 per month on average, the state

said. In addition, the total amount consumers would have to pay

each year for co-payments and other out of pocket costs would be

limited to $6,350 or less, depending on income.

Patients could choose plans that offer lower co-pays if they

wished, but would pay higher premiums. In some cases,

particularly for low and moderate income workers in their 20s,

the premiums are free once a federal subsidy is factored in.

PLAN OPTIONS

The exchange will also offer what it calls platinum plans,

in which co-payments are very low or non-existent. These plans

would cost $500 for those who do not qualify for subsidies, but

as little as $300 per month for low-wage earners.

The biggest subsidies go to people who make less than 150

percent of the federal poverty level, or about $17,000 for a

single person.

Peter V. Lee, a longtime health advocate recruited by the

state to help set up and run its program, said costs had been

expected to skyrocket because the Affordable Care Act requires

health plans to offer more benefits and cover more people than

they might otherwise have done.

For example, the plans must cover people with or without

pre-existing conditions that would make their care more

expensive. The actuarial firm Millman had predicted a 30 percent

rise in the cost of monthly premiums for individuals in

California under the new exchange.

But Lee said that did not happen. While rates without

subsidies may be moderately higher for some consumers next year,

most will pay less, he said. The rates announced on Thursday

must still be approved by state regulators.

Democratic Congressman Henry Waxman, who backed the health

reform act, said the program would protect millions from

bankruptcy due to medical costs.

“Californians buying coverage on their own will now have

access to the same quality coverage that people get through

their employers at the same or lower rates,” he said.

California’s exchange will offer coverage from 13 insurers –

down from more than 30 that had applied to participate.

Among them are some of the biggest names, including Anthem

Blue Cross, Blue Shield and Kaiser Permanente. Coverage will

also be offered by some companies that had previously limited

their activity to the Medicare and Medicaid markets.

Paul Markovich, president of Blue Shield of California,

which is offering coverage under the plan, said that to keep

prices low, doctors and hospitals had lowered some of their

rates. Some insurers also agreed to limit profits, Lee said.

The policies vary in their provider networks, but Lee said

consumers would have access to about 80 percent of doctors in

the state, and some of its premier medical centers.

Consumers will be able to begin signing up on Oct. 1 for

plans that will go into effect in January. Next month, the

California exchange will reveal plans and prices for insurance

that small business owners can purchase for their employees.

(Additional reporting by Caroline Humer and David Morgan;

Editing by Cynthia Johnston and Richard Chang)