Skip to content
Author
PUBLISHED: | UPDATED:
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

(Recasts with newest Grassley letters)

By Anna Yukhananov

WASHINGTON, July 16 (Reuters) – The top Republican on the

Senate Judiciary Committee urged U.S. law enforcement officials

to investigate whether the Food and Drug Administration violated

the law in its secret monitoring of staff emails.

Senator Chuck Grassley of Iowa said the FDA retaliated

against its employees who blew the whistle about unsafe medical

devices, and specifically monitored their emails to Congress. He

also asked the FDA to explain who at the agency first asked for

the email monitoring.

Six current and former FDA scientists and doctors filed a

lawsuit in January charging the agency tried to repress warnings

about potential corruption in device reviews by retaliating

against them for passing information to Congress and the media.

Over the weekend, the scandal grew when the New York Times

revealed documents detailing the wide scale of the surveillance

operation. The documents, which were inadvertently posted online

by an FDA contractor, showed the FDA secretly captured thousands

of emails the scientists sent privately to lawmakers, their

aides, journalists and President Barack Obama.

The report further stoked anger from lawmakers who were

already concerned about the surveillance.

After reviewing the documents, Grassley said he was

referring the case to the Department of Justice, among others,

to investigate whether the FDA violated the law on whistleblower

protections, and a separate law about the privacy of emails.

“Continued stonewalling and secrecy about the spying on

these employees’ protected disclosures is unacceptable,”

Grassley said in a letter to FDA Commissioner Margaret Hamburg

sent on Monday.

AUTHORIZED SPYING

Grassley also asked the FDA to finally explain which

official first requested the agency to monitor the private

emails of five employees, which began in 2010. The monitoring

was authorized by the FDA’s General Counsel, Grassley said.

Grassley first asked the FDA about this matter in January,

but in a response sent on Friday, the FDA said it was still

gathering the information.

The FDA said on Monday it monitored emails only to ensure

its staff were not sharing “trade secret” information about

specific device companies, which is forbidden by law, and that

it never stopped the whistleblowers from contacting lawmakers,

journalists or government auditors.

“The only individuals whose email was being monitored were

(five) FDA employees,” said Erica Jefferson, FDA spokeswoman.

“We did not impede or interfere in any way with any employees’

communication to members of Congress.”

In a letter to Grassley sent on Friday, the FDA also said it

is reviewing whether its secret monitoring of staff emails

adequately protected whistleblowers.

“FDA is currently reviewing and evaluating its policies and

practices to ensure that they are consistent with the law and

Congress’s intent to provide a secure channel for protected

disclosures,” Jeanne Ireland, the FDA’s assistant commissioner

for legislation, said in a letter.

The Office of Special Counsel (OSC), an independent agency

that protects federal whistleblowers, in February broadened an

investigation into whether the FDA violated the law by keeping

track of employee emails to Congress and the OSC. Such emails

are supposed to remain confidential.

The OSC and the Office of Management and Budget also sent

memos to all government agencies in June, warning them about the

legal restrictions on monitoring employees’ emails. The memos

suggest other agencies beyond the FDA may face similar issues in

monitoring whistleblowers.

CONGRESSIONAL LETTERS

Grassley also questioned how an FDA contractor, Quality

Associates Inc, was able to post thousands of pages of FDA’s

internal email monitoring, including confidential company

information, on a file transfer site that was available to the

public until late last week.

Quality Associates, which archives and manages documents,

also has contracts with the National Institutes of Health, the

Internal Revenue Service and the Department of Homeland

Security, among others.

The online documents also included internal emails and

documents for NIH grants, Grassley said.

The FDA said it is also investigating what happened with the

data breach at Quality Associates.

The company, based in Fulton, Md., was not immediately

available for comment after the close of business on Monday.

(Reporting by Anna Yukhananov; Editing by Tim Dobbyn, Bernard

Orr)