Skip to content
Author
PUBLISHED: | UPDATED:
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

* Tough spot for Obama, but chance to show strength

* Rice was state’s Africa point when embassies bombed

* Corker urges Obama to “take breath” before nomination

* Playing politics with Kerry’s seat?

By Patricia Zengerle

WASHINGTON, Nov 28 (Reuters) – Susan Rice’s attempts to ease

the concerns of her Republican critics seemed to have little

effect on Wednesday, as more U.S. senators – including a

moderate one-time supporter – raised new questions about her

despite two days of meetings at the Capitol.

U.S. Senator Susan Collins met with the U.S. Ambassador to

the United Nations for over an hour, over the Sept. 11 attacks

on the U.S. mission in Benghazi, Libya. Collins said afterward

she could not back Rice for secretary of state, if she is

nominated by President Barack Obama, without more information.

The moderate Republican even brought up a new concern, about

Rice’s record in the State Department 14 years ago in connection

with the 1998 bombings of U.S. embassies in Africa.

Other Republicans have threatened to block Rice’s nomination

if Obama picks her to replace Secretary of State Hillary

Clinton, which would require Senate confirmation.

Obama, who has strongly supported his embattled ambassador,

gave a show of moral support on Wednesday, prompting applause

from his Cabinet – including Clinton – during their first

meeting at the White House since Obama’s re-election on Nov. 6.

“Susan Rice is extraordinary,” Obama said, adding that he

“couldn’t be prouder of the job she’s done.”

Votes from moderates like Collins, who introduced Rice to

the Senate Foreign Relations Committee when Obama nominated her

to the U.N. post three years ago, would be needed to overcome

procedural obstacles and win confirmation.

“I still have many questions that remain unanswered,”

Collins told reporters after a 75-minute meeting with Rice.

The top Republican on the Homeland Security Committee,

Collins said she still wanted more information about the Sept.

11 attack on the U.S. mission and a nearby CIA annex in

Benghazi, Libya, in which the U.S. ambassador and three other

Americans were killed.

The controversy raises the unpleasant specter of Obama

starting his second term with a nasty confirmation fight. But he

also risks looking weak if he seems to give in to criticism from

the party he just defeated to win re-election.

Obama should nominate Rice if he feels she is the best

choice, said Lawrence Korb, a former assistant secretary of

defense now at the liberal Center for American Progress.

He predicted that she would win confirmation, given that the

main objection to her was over a political point that defeated

Republican candidate Mitt Romney tried to feature in his failed

presidential campaign this year.

“The Republicans are desperate for an issue,” Korb said.

“She’s not the issue. The issue is that they want to undermine

his (foreign policy) narrative.”

Sticking with Rice could also be a potent demonstration of

strength for Obama, Korb said, reminiscent of Republican

President Ronald Reagan. Reagan, who is revered by his party,

won points for winning the confirmation of Al Haig as Secretary

of State in 1981, despite objections over Haig’s ties to the

Watergate scandal, he noted.

Some observers have speculated that the Republicans would

prefer Obama nominate Senator John Kerry, leaving the door open

for a Republican to win his vacated Massachusetts seat and

narrowing the Democratic majority in the Senate.

Collins said she would support Kerry. “I think John Kerry

would be an excellent appointment and will be easily confirmed

by his colleagues,” she told reporters.

NEW OBJECTIONS

Collins stressed at length that the United States seems not

to have learned lessons from the bombings of the embassies in

Kenya and Tanzania in 1998, when Rice was the State Department’s

Africa region head.

Collins said this year’s attack in Benghazi “echoed” those

attacks. “In both cases, the ambassador begged for additional

security,” and State turned down both requests, she said.

“I asked Ambassador Rice what her role was. She said that

she would have to refresh her memory but that she was not

involved directly in turning down the request. But surely, given

her position as assistant secretary for African Affairs, she had

to have been aware,” Collins said.

Republicans have openly criticized Rice for initial comments

after the Benghazi attack that suggested it was a spontaneous

event arising from protests of an anti-Islam film rather than a

planned terrorist strike.

Intelligence officials later said the attack was possibly

tied to al Qaeda affiliates.

Republicans have argued that the Obama administration tried

to play down the terrorist angle in its initial comments to

avoid undermining the president’s claims of success in fighting

al Qaeda in the run-up to the Nov. 6 election.

Rice, accompanied by acting CIA Director Michael Morell,

also met with Senator Bob Corker, who is line to be the top

Republican on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

After his meeting, Corker had tough words for the Benghazi

attack and the aftermath, which he termed a “tawdry affair,”

that would add to Americans’ distrust of the government.

He declined to discuss whether he would support Rice, but

urged Obama to “step back” from the controversy and “take a deep

breath” as he decided whom to nominate.

Rice also met for about an hour behind closed doors on

Tuesday with Republican Senators John McCain, Lindsey Graham and

Kelly Ayotte, who have been among her most vocal critics.