By Anthony Deutsch
THE HAGUE, May 2 (Reuters) – With an uprising in Syria
loosening the grip of president Bashar al-Assad, world powers
are worried that he could lose control of a secret stockpile of
chemical weapons, giving militants access to deadly poison gas.
Syria is one of just eight states – along with its arch foe
Israel and nearby Egypt – that have not joined the 1997 Chemical
Weapons Convention, which means the world’s chemical weapons
watchdog has no jurisdiction to intervene there.
Western countries believe that Damascus has the world’s
largest remaining stockpile of undeclared chemical weapons –
including mustard gas and the deadly VX nerve agent – which
Assad maintains as a counterbalance to Israel’s undeclared
nuclear arsenal.
The Syrian army is trained to use poison gas and, according
to US and Israeli intelligence, can deploy it on long-range
missiles. In a sign of growing concern, an Israeli factory was
refinanced to ramp up production of gas masks to prepare for a
possible attack, an Israeli member of parliament told Reuters.
“The arsenal, based on reports, is quite alarming,” Ahmet
Uzumcu, head of the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical
Weapons (OPCW), said in an interview with Reuters.
“If those reports are correct it would really take a lot of
resources and efforts to destroy, to eliminate, those stocks.”
Syrian unrest undermines Assad’s ability to secure his
arsenal from armed groups – such as his Shi’ite Muslim regional
ally Hezbollah, or the Sunni militants among his opponents.
In Washington, General Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint
Chiefs of Staff, described Syria’s stockpile as a major source
of concern for the United States, which he said had prepared
contingency plans with regional partners.
The main threat, Dempsey told the House Armed Services
Committee last month, is Syria’s “proliferation or the potential
proliferation of chemical and biological weapons – that is to
say weapons of mass destruction.”
GRAVE CONCERNS
Because it has not signed the chemical weapons ban treaty
and the United Nations has not intervened, Syria is under no
international obligation to declare its chemical weapons, give
them up or allow inspectors to monitor them.
“There is a very odd silence in the corridors of the OPCW
about Syria, even though several individual countries have
expressed grave concerns,” said an OPCW official.
“The silence doesn’t mean there is a lack of concern. It is
definitely the 800 pound gorilla in the room,” he said. “Syria
is the overriding source of concern for chemical weapons in the
world right now.”
With the OPCW’s hands tied, the only international forum to
discuss Syria’s chemical weapons would be the U.N. Security
Council, where officials said the issue has not been raised.
In late February, Uzumcu met U.N. Secretary General Ban
Ki-moon. They “noted with concern the reports on the possible
existence of chemical weapons,” but took no further action.
Uzumcu said his teams could deploy within 12 hours for an
inspection were they given an order by the United Nations.
“That would obviously require some preparedness for some
specific cases like Syria…but chemical weapons are chemical
weapons, so this is well known to our experts,” Uzumcu said.
Syria has joined the 1925 Geneva Protocol, which prohibits
first use of chemical or biological weapons, but does not
mention production, storage or transfer of them.
The OPCW, the Hague-based organization founded to oversee a
ban on the production, stockpiling and use of chemical weapons,
has 188 member nations, but has struggled to bring on board
countries in the Middle East, where poison gas has been used
repeatedly since the 1960s.
Egypt deployed phosgene and mustard gas against Yemeni
royalist forces in the mid 1960s. It has not reported the
destruction of chemical agents or weapons to the OPCW.
Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein killed thousands of Iranians
and Iraqi Kurds in more than a dozen poison gas attacks during
the Iran-Iraq war in the 1980s. In March 1988 Iraq dropped
canisters of Tabun, Sarin, VX and mustard gas, killing 5,000
villagers in the Kurdish town of Halabja.
U.S. and British suspicion that Saddam still possessed
chemical and biological weapons – despite being ordered by the
Security Council to give them up – became the justification for
the 2003 invasion to topple him.
After the invasion no banned weapons were found, seriously
damaging the credibility of Washington, London and their
intelligence agencies.
Libya, which developed a chemical weapons program under the
late leader Muammar Gaddafi, is set to resume destroying tonnes
of ageing mustard gas later this year with the help of the OPCW.
NIGHTMARE SCENARIO
A weakened Assad could have difficulty keeping weapons out
of the hands of others, and a desperate Assad might be more
inclined to use them or give them to allies.
“The most dangerous possibility is that unrest in Syria
degrades the state’s capability to maintain security to the
point where not all the chemical weapons stockpiles are secure,”
said Ayham Kamel, Middle East analyst at consultancy Eurasia
Group. “The nightmare scenario is that they fall into the hands
of al Qaeda.”
“Syria could try to break the regional balance of power by
supplying Hizbollah with an arsenal that could threaten Western
interests,” Kamel said.
If the conflict crosses borders, Assad’s conventional forces
are not as powerful as those of Israel or NATO ally Turkey, “so
there is a need to use asymmetrical warfare, and chemical
weapons could be used,” Kamel added.
Israel, which fought four wars with Syria since 1948, feels
most threatened. Israel’s premier think-tank, the Institute for
National Security Studies, reassessed the risk in a review of
the regional security implications of “Arab Spring” uprisings.
“Syria is considered a superpower in the chemical and
biological realm…The chemical weapons are stored, protected,
and controlled by al-Assad’s loyal forces,” it said.
If the stockpiles are obtained by organizations such as the
Taliban, Hizbollah, al Qaeda or Hamas, “it will be more likely
that such weapons will be used in some scenario in the region.”
Those fears prompted Israel to provide 80 million shekels
(about $20 million) in government support to a gas mask factory
to secure production until the end of the year.
Roughly 60 percent of Israelis were supplied with the
protective gear before the factory ran into financial troubles
and was nearly closed, said Zev Bielski, an opposition lawmaker
on the parliamentary panel for homefront war-readiness.
“The risk will be greater as violence continues to
escalate,” said Anthony Skinner, Middle East analyst at
Maplecroft, a consultancy firm.
“We are more concerned about opportunistic Islamist
militants seeking to exploit the turbulence, get their hands on
chemical weapons and smuggle them out of the country.”
(Reporting by Anthony Deutsch, Dan Williams, Louis Charbonneau,
Missy Ryan, and Peter Apps.)
