Skip to content
Author
PUBLISHED: | UPDATED:
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

(This blog post originally appeared on the On the Case blog on

Thomson Reuters News & Insight http://newsandinsight.com.)

By Andrew Longstreth

NEW YORK, May 21 (Reuters) – BP Plc appears to be

well on its way to concluding an estimated $7.8 billion

settlement to resolve most of its civil liability from the Gulf

of Mexico oil spill. But a potential landmine lurks in the

settlement documents: under certain circumstances, the company

can invoke a little-noticed provision that allows it to walk

away from the deal.

The potential landmine is opt-outs. In a settlement of a

class action, class members can reject the deal and decide to go

it alone. Defendants have to be prepared for the possibility

that a high volume of opt-out litigation will undermine the goal

of global resolution. BP certainly is prepared: Its settlement

agreement with plaintiffs claiming economic and property damages

includes a provision that gives BP the right to terminate the

deal if the total of opt-outs “exceeds a number agreed to by the

parties.”

So what’s the number? That’s the $7.8 billion question. The

settlement agreement doesn’t say. In fact, the document states

that the opt-out number that could trigger a blowup is to be

submitted to the court “in a sealed envelope.”

It’s not clear why BP is keeping the number secret. A

spokesman for BP said that it was “part of the settlement

negotiation process.”

Others said they suspect there’s more to it. Plaintiffs’

lawyer Tony Buzbee of the Buzbee Law Firm, who is weighing

whether to recommend the settlement to his clients, said BP may

want the number kept under seal so that lawyers with lots of

clients do not team up and threaten to opt out in an effort to

extract a favorable deal. “They don’t want a coalition of

attorneys getting together saying we’re not going to participate

unless you treat us differently,” said Buzbee, who added that

he’s never before encountered an opt-out provision with a secret

trigger.

Edward Sherman, a professor at Tulane University Law School,

said that by keeping the trigger number private BP was also

giving itself the option of accepting the deal even if the

opt-outs exceed its threshold. “They can go ahead and accept it,

and they’re not committed to a public number,” Sherman said.

Earlier this month, U.S. District Judge Carl Barbier in New

Orleans granted preliminary approval to the pact between BP and

thousands of private plaintiffs affected by the spill. Barbier

set a fairness hearing date for Nov. 8, when he will consider

granting final approval. In the meantime, plaintiffs who are

part of the class have until Aug. 31 to file objections to the

settlement. Those plaintiffs also face a deadline of Oct. 1 to

opt out of the settlement.

(Reporting by Andrew Longstreth; Editing by Eddie Evans)